Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | 1247 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-05-03 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | |||||
* | 1246 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-05-03 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | |||||
* | 1225 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-29 | 1 | -0/+2 |
| | | | | Finally start tracing the actual instructions as they run. | ||||
* | 1223 - more stable traces for parse scenarios | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-29 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | |||||
* | 1213 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-28 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | |||||
* | 1194 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-24 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 1184 - finally, concurrency | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-24 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 1075 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | |||||
* | 1069 - rename record/field to container/element | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-16 | 1 | -0/+31 |
This seems more obvious to laypeople. I've also come up with a design for sum types: I'm going to call them exclusive containers. You call 'get' on containers, 'index' on arrays, and 'maybe-convert' on exclusive containers (as well as tagged types, but that's even later). |