| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | 966 - c++: starting on default-space | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-21 | 1 | -0/+15 |
| | | |||||
| * | 965 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-21 | 1 | -0/+36 |
| | | |||||
| * | 963 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-20 | 1 | -0/+11 |
| | | | | | Amazing how easy that was. | ||||
| * | 962 - no, not quite | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-20 | 1 | -0/+8 |
| | | | | | A big one left: tracking the size of reagents. | ||||
| * | 961 - done converting names? | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-20 | 1 | -0/+31 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | I'm making two changes to how I compute field offsets: a) I just replace offset names up front, before I even manage field names. I don't bother disallowing x:integer and x:offset in the same function. Let's see if that leads us astray. Certainly saves code. b) I don't bother canonizing the first arg of a get since we know it has to have a type that is some number of 'address' followed by a record. Just assume that we have the right number of 'deref's. | ||||
| * | 960 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-20 | 1 | -0/+10 |
| | | |||||
| * | 959 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-20 | 2 | -0/+16 |
| | | |||||
| * | 957 - starting to do name translation | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-18 | 1 | -0/+9 |
| | | |||||
| * | 952 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-18 | 3 | -3/+0 |
| | | |||||
| * | 951 - done with break/loop | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-18 | 17 | -122/+212 |
| | | |||||
| * | 950 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-17 | 2 | -0/+68 |
| | | |||||
| * | 949 - paving the way for jumps to labels | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-17 | 69 | -339/+342 |
| | | | | | Addresses for reagents are now computed after all transforms. | ||||
| * | 944 - more break/loop tests | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-17 | 6 | -1/+160 |
| | | | | | I still can't handle jumps to labels. That'll require some rejiggering.. | ||||
| * | 943 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-17 | 3 | -0/+78 |
| | | |||||
| * | 941 - c++: basic break/loop conversion | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-16 | 51 | -0/+247 |
| | | |||||
| * | 940 - c++: some changes to instruction model | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-16 | 57 | -315/+315 |
| | | |||||
| * | 939 - c++: fix an old parsing hack | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-16 | 6 | -11/+18 |
| | | |||||
| * | 938 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-16 | 1 | -7/+9 |
| | | |||||
| * | 936 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-16 | 1 | -9/+7 |
| | | |||||
| * | 935 - permit '{' and '}' as legal labels | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-16 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | |||||
| * | 929 - recipes again take ingredients and reply with results | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-15 | 2 | -7/+1 |
| | | |||||
| * | 928 - 'call' layer is now more cohesive | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-15 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | | It does less though. Args temporarily not supported. | ||||
| * | 924 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-14 | 1 | -0/+6 |
| | | |||||
| * | 904 - c++: replying from recipes | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-14 | 3 | -2/+32 |
| | | |||||
| * | 902: c++: calling recipes with ingredients | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-14 | 2 | -1/+19 |
| | | |||||
| * | 900 - c++: calling 'recipes' | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-13 | 1 | -0/+11 |
| | | |||||
| * | 832 - call-stack for C++ version | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-25 | 44 | -118/+118 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | These #defines and references now span many different layers. Let's see if the lack of encapsulation causes problems. Also interesting to run into a case where I need to modify a foundational layer and touch every single scenario/trace. Only alternative was to duplicate all the different layers that add instructions. Sign of problems with this model? | ||||
| * | 823 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-22 | 2 | -0/+70 |
| | | |||||
| * | 819 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-22 | 2 | -6/+6 |
| | | |||||
| * | 817 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-22 | 2 | -0/+60 |
| | | |||||
| * | 815 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-22 | 1 | -2/+0 |
| | | |||||
| * | 814 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-22 | 2 | -2/+32 |
| | | |||||
| * | 813 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-22 | 3 | -14/+14 |
| | | |||||
| * | 812 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-21 | 1 | -2/+0 |
| | | |||||
| * | 811 - first test for arrays | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-21 | 1 | -0/+37 |
| | | |||||
| * | 808 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-21 | 1 | -0/+13 |
| | | |||||
| * | 807 - first passing test for indirect addressing | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-21 | 1 | -0/+20 |
| | | |||||
| * | 806 - start parsing reagent metadata | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-21 | 1 | -0/+3 |
| | | |||||
| * | 804 - reagent can have multiple types | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-20 | 5 | -29/+28 |
| | | |||||
| * | 802 - mu comments | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-20 | 1 | -0/+6 |
| | | | | | | | Comments at end of line are still hacky; we just rely on the fact that excess ingredients do no harm. We'll need to be smarter when we get our first vararg recipe. | ||||
| * | 801 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-20 | 1 | -0/+24 |
| | | |||||
| * | 799 - 'get' on records | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-20 | 1 | -0/+26 |
| | | |||||
| * | 798 - start of record support | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-19 | 1 | -0/+21 |
| | | |||||
| * | 797 - comparison instructions | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-19 | 12 | -0/+276 |
| | | |||||
| * | 796 - jump instructions done | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-19 | 7 | -0/+81 |
| | | |||||
| * | 795 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-19 | 3 | -0/+60 |
| | | |||||
| * | 787 - arithmetic operations | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-19 | 11 | -0/+183 |
| | | | | | Lots of duplication here; we'll clean it up later. | ||||
| * | 784 - persist traces in literate version | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-19 | 4 | -0/+8 |
| | | |||||
| * | 774 - start persisting test traces | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-17 | 4 | -0/+11 |