Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | 981 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-26 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 980 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-26 | 1 | -5/+2 |
| | |||||
* | 971 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-25 | 1 | -4/+2 |
| | |||||
* | 966 - c++: starting on default-space | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-21 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 961 - done converting names? | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-20 | 1 | -0/+5 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | I'm making two changes to how I compute field offsets: a) I just replace offset names up front, before I even manage field names. I don't bother disallowing x:integer and x:offset in the same function. Let's see if that leads us astray. Certainly saves code. b) I don't bother canonizing the first arg of a get since we know it has to have a type that is some number of 'address' followed by a record. Just assume that we have the right number of 'deref's. | ||||
* | 959 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-20 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 956 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-18 | 1 | -2/+3 |
| | | | | Cleaner way to signal that a reagent's value has been computed. | ||||
* | 949 - paving the way for jumps to labels | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-17 | 1 | -3/+2 |
| | | | | Addresses for reagents are now computed after all transforms. | ||||
* | 946 - selectively run just some tests | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-17 | 1 | -7/+0 |
| | |||||
* | 940 - c++: some changes to instruction model | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-16 | 1 | -16/+32 |
| | |||||
* | 934 - extensible transform framework for mu's lightweight tools | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-16 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 932 - clean up comments in the tangled c++ | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-16 | 1 | -4/+6 |
| | |||||
* | 917 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-14 | 1 | -0/+6 |
| | |||||
* | 901 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-03-13 | 1 | -1/+4 |
| | |||||
* | 832 - call-stack for C++ version | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-25 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| | | | | | | | | | | These #defines and references now span many different layers. Let's see if the lack of encapsulation causes problems. Also interesting to run into a case where I need to modify a foundational layer and touch every single scenario/trace. Only alternative was to duplicate all the different layers that add instructions. Sign of problems with this model? | ||||
* | 821 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-22 | 1 | -6/+2 |
| | |||||
* | 815 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-22 | 1 | -4/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 814 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-22 | 1 | -0/+4 |
| | |||||
* | 810 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-21 | 1 | -1/+2 |
| | |||||
* | 806 - start parsing reagent metadata | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-21 | 1 | -2/+18 |
| | |||||
* | 804 - reagent can have multiple types | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-20 | 1 | -10/+18 |
| | |||||
* | 798 - start of record support | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-19 | 1 | -2/+9 |
| | |||||
* | 789 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-19 | 1 | -6/+7 |
| | |||||
* | 787 - arithmetic operations | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-19 | 1 | -4/+4 |
| | | | | Lots of duplication here; we'll clean it up later. | ||||
* | 783 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-19 | 1 | -2/+8 |
| | |||||
* | 782 - promote literate version to canonical C++ version | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-18 | 1 | -0/+145 |