Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | 1120 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-22 | 1 | -8/+6 |
| | |||||
* | 1118 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-21 | 2 | -4/+2 |
| | |||||
* | 1117 - redo entire tangler | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-21 | 4 | -260/+284 |
| | | | | | | | | | | Instead of adding a third-level hack for the new bug (failing test) with multiple directives, I'm giving up on deducing #line directives directly. Instead I'm going to maintain the file and line for every single line as I read it, and then emit directives on their basis as a post-processing step. This way tangling itself can remain oblivious to line numbers, even if we're passing objects around rather than naked strings. | ||||
* | 1116 - simpler memory checks | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-20 | 5 | -55/+85 |
| | |||||
* | 1115 - another pass at names: console and display | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-20 | 2 | -8/+12 |
| | | | | (Follow-up to 544.) | ||||
* | 1114 - more primitives for managing the cursor | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-20 | 2 | -0/+78 |
| | |||||
* | 1113 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-20 | 2 | -4/+4 |
| | |||||
* | 1112 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-20 | 2 | -4/+4 |
| | |||||
* | 1111 - start adding ncurses primitives | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-20 | 3 | -1/+40 |
| | |||||
* | 1110 - 'scenarios' directive applies only to current file | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-20 | 7 | -7/+5 |
| | |||||
* | 1109 - interpolate strings | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-20 | 4 | -0/+2235 |
| | |||||
* | 1108 - check for typos in memory expectations in scenarios | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-20 | 2 | -0/+20 |
| | |||||
* | 1107 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-20 | 2 | -1/+49 |
| | |||||
* | 1106 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-20 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 1105 - more primitives for managing ingredients | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-19 | 33 | -50/+164 |
| | |||||
* | 1104 - support 'dump' in mu scenarios | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-19 | 1 | -4/+7 |
| | |||||
* | 1103 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-19 | 2 | -0/+32 |
| | |||||
* | 1102 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-19 | 2 | -0/+23 |
| | |||||
* | 1101 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-19 | 17 | -56/+57 |
| | |||||
* | 1100 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-19 | 2 | -0/+829 |
| | |||||
* | 1099 - new recipe: convert integer to decimal string | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-18 | 10 | -14/+1292 |
| | |||||
* | 1097 - 'grow-buffer' works the first time! | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-18 | 2 | -0/+372 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I thought I'd need to duplicate scenarios to simulate running some code, making some checks, running some more code. But I can just keep saving state to raw locations! I'd still have to manage raw locations myself, though. And it can be ping-pongy to have to check on the other blocks then go back to the run block. But what's the alternative? Multiple run blocks (even excluding the implementation effort) raise questions of namespace sharing across them. If it gets too bad I can intersperse recipes inside the scenario. Yes, that will work. Of course, overly long tests might themselves be a bad idea. We'll see, this is all terra incognita syntactically speaking. This might not be enough to check that a routine is waiting on a channel, but should keep us until then. Wait, even there what you need is a way to check on the status of your child routines. Yeah, doable. Even if we're getting ahead of ourselves. | ||||
* | 1096 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-18 | 5 | -5/+5 |
| | |||||
* | 1095 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-18 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 1094 - demarcate sections in layers | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 12 | -27/+46 |
| | | | | | | We have tangled vs regular comments, but they highlight the same. So we're still at 3 colors for comments. Anything more starts to seem gratuitous. | ||||
* | 1092 - vim: auto-insert tangle comments like regular ones | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 1 | -0/+3 |
| | |||||
* | 1091 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 2 | -18/+17 |
| | |||||
* | 1090 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 9 | -20/+684 |
| | |||||
* | 1089 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 2 | -0/+71 |
| | |||||
* | 1088 - start porting the 'buffer' type | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 5 | -1/+230 |
| | |||||
* | 1087 - mu files can now define containers and exclusive containers | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 4 | -1/+102 |
| | |||||
* | 1086 - support variant names in 'maybe-convert' | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 2 | -3/+63 |
| | |||||
* | 1085 - to access variants of sum types use 'maybe-convert' | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 4 | -1/+111 |
| | |||||
* | 1084 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 30 | -51/+56 |
| | |||||
* | 1083 - start of a sum type for mu | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 3 | -0/+89 |
| | |||||
* | 1082 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 3 | -11/+10 |
| | | | | | Turns out I'm only able to define a 'raise' macro because I have include no system headers after that point. | ||||
* | 1081 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 1080 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 1079 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 1078 - better line numbers | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 3 | -1/+25 |
| | | | | Skip tangle comments inside tangle rather than in the makefile. | ||||
* | 1077 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 21 | -16/+49 |
| | |||||
* | 1076 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 1 | -2/+5 |
| | |||||
* | 1075 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 68 | -174/+157 |
| | |||||
* | 1074 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 31 | -52/+52 |
| | |||||
* | 1073 - stop fixing the values of primitive recipes | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 14 | -163/+102 |
| | | | | | In the process I give up trace stability when I move files around, but I gain in exchange the ability to move files around. | ||||
* | 1072 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-17 | 20 | -0/+0 |
| | |||||
* | 1071 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-16 | 1 | -0/+0 |
| | |||||
* | 1070 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-16 | 1 | -0/+4 |
| | |||||
* | 1069 - rename record/field to container/element | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-16 | 12 | -48/+61 |
| | | | | | | | | | This seems more obvious to laypeople. I've also come up with a design for sum types: I'm going to call them exclusive containers. You call 'get' on containers, 'index' on arrays, and 'maybe-convert' on exclusive containers (as well as tagged types, but that's even later). | ||||
* | 1068 - better line numbers | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-04-15 | 2 | -9/+90 |
| | | | | | Line numbers were broken after inserting some lines from elsewhere. Now we add a #line directive not just before the lines but also after. |