| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | 718 - disable raw memory warnings in tests | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-02-08 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| | | |||||
| * | 428 - cleanup odds and ends | Kartik K. Agaram | 2014-12-14 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | |||||
| * | 405 - permit loading just low levels of codebase | Kartik K. Agaram | 2014-12-13 | 1 | -1/+5 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When I'm doing extensive surgery to the internals I want to avoid loading higher levels; they aren't expected to work. But I don't want to keep different levels in separate files just for that. And I definitely don't want to put low-level stuff first. Now I can influence loading in a cross-cutting manner by creating sections with numbers: (section 100 ...code...) And disabling them by running: $ ./anarki/arc 99 mu.arc.t Currently we load all mu 'system software' in level 100, so running at level 99 sidesteps them. Lower levels coming soon. But most of the time we don't need to worry about levels, and the 'mu' script lets us forget about them. Just run .mu files with: $ ./mu factorial.mu To run tests: $ ./mu test mu.arc.t | ||||
| * | 403 - 'function' is more clear than 'def' | Kartik K. Agaram | 2014-12-12 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | |||||
| * | 400 - another fix | Kartik K. Agaram | 2014-12-08 | 1 | -15/+16 |
| | | |||||
| * | 314 - better syntax for functions | Kartik K. Agaram | 2014-11-24 | 1 | -4/+4 |
| | | |||||
| * | 202 - variable names for edit.mu | Kartik K. Agaram | 2014-11-01 | 1 | -11/+1 |
| | | |||||
| * | 160 - fix stale editor test | Kartik K. Agaram | 2014-10-28 | 1 | -30/+5 |
| | | |||||
| * | 123 - experiment: build the reading flow around the *test* file | Kartik K. Agaram | 2014-10-10 | 1 | -0/+25 |
| | | |||||
| * | 121 - finally I can alloc a 2D array | Kartik K. Agaram | 2014-10-07 | 1 | -14/+26 |
| | | |||||
| * | 118 - persist all test traces | Kartik K. Agaram | 2014-10-07 | 1 | -0/+3 |
| | | |||||
| * | 113 - slight progress working with screen 2D array | Kartik K. Agaram | 2014-10-06 | 1 | -0/+22 |
| Why did it take forever to realize nobody will set the array length, that I have to do it for myself? | |||||