about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/factorial.mu
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* 2735 - define recipes using 'def'Kartik K. Agaram2016-03-081-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | I'm dropping all mention of 'recipe' terminology from the Readme. That way I hope to avoid further bike-shedding discussions while I very slowly decide on the right terminology with my students. I could be smarter in my error messages and use 'recipe' when code uses it and 'function' otherwise. But what about other words like ingredient? It would all add complexity that I'm not yet sure is worthwhile. But I do want separate experiences for veteran programmers reading about Mu on github and for people learning programming using Mu.
* 2426Kartik K. Agaram2015-11-111-4/+3
|
* 1880 - switch .mu files to new type-deducing idiomKartik K. Agaram2015-07-291-7/+7
|
* 1868 - start using naked literals everywhereKartik K. Agaram2015-07-281-5/+5
| | | | First step to reducing typing burden. Next step: inferring types.
* 1780 - now we always reclaim local scopesKartik K. Agaram2015-07-131-2/+2
| | | | | | But still no difference in either memory footprint or in running time. This will teach me -- for the umpteenth time -- to optimize before measuring.
* 1773 - update all mu recipes to new-default-spaceKartik K. Agaram2015-07-131-2/+2
| | | | | Turns out to not affect memory utilization or run-time. At all. But still looks nicer and requires less fudging on our part.
* 1663Kartik K. Agaram2015-06-251-1/+1
|
* 1469Kartik K. Agaram2015-05-261-2/+2
|
* 1442Kartik K. Agaram2015-05-231-1/+1
|
* 1363 - rename 'integer' to 'number'Kartik K. Agaram2015-05-131-9/+9
| | | | ..now that we support non-integers.
* 1298 - better ingredient/product handlingKartik K. Agaram2015-05-071-3/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | All primitives now always write to all their products. If a product is not used that's fine, but if an instruction seems to expect too many products mu will complain. In the process, many primitives can operate on more than two ingredients where it seems intuitive. You can add or divide more than two numbers together, copy or negate multiple corresponding locations, etc. There's one remaining bit of ugliness. Some instructions like get/get-address, index/index-address, wait-for-location, these can unnecessarily load values from memory when they don't need to. Useful vim commands: %s/ingredients\[\([^\]]*\)\]/ingredients.at(\1)/gc %s/products\[\([^\]]*\)\]/products.at(\1)/gc .,$s/\[\(.\)]/.at(\1)/gc
* 1276 - make C++ version the defaultKartik K. Agaram2015-05-051-20/+34
| | | | I've tried to update the Readme, but there are at least a couple of issues.
* 690 - convention: '$' commands for debugging onlyKartik K. Agaram2015-02-011-2/+2
| | | | | | Swap printing generalized objects using arc's infrastructure to be the $-prefixed debug helper, while the erstwhile $print-key-to-host becomes the primitive print-character to host.
* 578 - switch to non-polymorphic 'print' functionsKartik K. Agaram2015-01-171-1/+1
| | | | | Also clean up various prints from last few commits. As a convention, for debugging we always print directly to host.
* 574 - printing string literals is a hack; hard-code it in for nowKartik K. Agaram2015-01-161-2/+2
|
* 571 - screen primitives take an explicit terminalKartik K. Agaram2015-01-151-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This will let me swap in a fake in tests. Still hacky, though. I'm sure I'm not managing the parameter right in the chessboard app. And then there's the question of whether it should also appear as an output operand. But it's a start. And using nil to mean 'real' is a reasonable convention. If I ever need to handle multiple screens perhaps we'll have to switch to 1:literal/terminal and 2:literal/terminal, etc. But those are equally easy to guard on.
* 497 - strengthen the concept of 'space'Kartik K. Agaram2015-01-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 'default-scope' is now 'default-space' 'closure-generator' is now 'next-space-generator' The connection to high-level syntax for closures is now tenuous, so we'll call the 'outer scope' the 'next space'. So, let's try to create a few sentences with all these related ideas: Names map to addresses offset from a default-space when it's provided. Spaces can be strung together. The zeroth variable points to the next space, the one that is accessed when a variable has /space:1. To map a name to an address in the next space, you need to know what function generated that space. A corollary is that the space passed in to a function should always be generated by a single function. Spaces can be used to construct lexical scopes and objects.
* 428 - cleanup odds and endsKartik K. Agaram2014-12-141-13/+13
|
* 403 - 'function' is more clear than 'def'Kartik K. Agaram2014-12-121-2/+2
|
* 401 - stop abbreviating opsKartik K. Agaram2014-12-121-4/+4
| | | | | We expect users to come across mu from arbitrary bits of code, so try to make each line as self-contained as possible.
* 314 - better syntax for functionsKartik K. Agaram2014-11-241-4/+6
|
* 307Kartik K. Agaram2014-11-231-1/+4
|
* 269Kartik K. Agaram2014-11-181-0/+2
| | | | | | Minor cleanup and code comments. I'm starting to feel the need for formatting primitives, so I don't use comments just to provide section headings.
* 268 - recursive function: factorialKartik K. Agaram2014-11-171-0/+15
Is this really harder to reason about by being somehow 'operational' and 'abstraction free'? http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2010/8/96632-an-interview-with-edsger-w-dijkstra/fulltext