Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | 4478 | Kartik Agaram | 2018-08-04 | 1 | -390/+0 |
| | |||||
* | 4239 | Kartik Agaram | 2018-05-08 | 1 | -8/+8 |
| | |||||
* | 4199 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2018-01-25 | 1 | -280/+318 |
| | |||||
* | 4161 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-12-15 | 1 | -10/+10 |
| | |||||
* | 4084 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 1 | -53/+59 |
| | | | | | subx: extract helpers for 'push' and 'pop'. We will be using them in 'call' and 'ret' as well. | ||||
* | 4083 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 1 | -1/+30 |
| | | | | subx: 'pop' | ||||
* | 4082 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | | subx: correct a 'copy' ('mov') instruction as well to get its operand right from the opcode. | ||||
* | 4080 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 1 | -13/+19 |
| | | | | | | | | subx: correct 'push' register. It gets its operand right from the opcode, not a new modrm byte. Have I misinterpreted any other instructions in this manner (`+rd` in the Intel manual)? | ||||
* | 4079 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 1 | -0/+26 |
| | | | | subx: 'pop' | ||||
* | 4078 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-17 | 1 | -46/+46 |
| | |||||
* | 4077 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-17 | 1 | -8/+8 |
| | | | | | Stop hyperlinking every `i` in subx html files to the integer register union. | ||||
* | 4072 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-16 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| | |||||
* | 4069 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-15 | 1 | -19/+19 |
| | | | | subx: unconditional 'jump' | ||||
* | 4067 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-15 | 1 | -1/+22 |
| | | | | subx: 'mov' | ||||
* | 4066 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-14 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | | | I spent a while spelunking into the code generated by C compilers before realizing that ignoring the order of arguments for 'cmp' instructions clarifies everything. | ||||
* | 4065 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-14 | 1 | -0/+45 |
| | | | | | | subx: 'compare' Hopefully I've implemented the 'sense' of comparisons right.. | ||||
* | 4064 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-14 | 1 | -14/+14 |
| | |||||
* | 4062 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-13 | 1 | -19/+19 |
| | |||||
* | 4059 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-13 | 1 | -72/+159 |
| | |||||
* | 4054 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 1 | -16/+16 |
| | |||||
* | 4052 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 1 | -0/+132 |