Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | 4135 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-12-03 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 4134 - 'input' = 'ingredient' | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-12-03 | 83 | -1048/+1105 |
| | |||||
* | 4133 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-11-25 | 5 | -146/+171 |
| | |||||
* | 4123 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-11-16 | 1 | -24/+14 |
| | |||||
* | 4122 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-11-15 | 13 | -1242/+1266 |
| | |||||
* | 4118 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-11-06 | 1 | -291/+292 |
| | |||||
* | 4117 - done with delimited continuations | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-11-06 | 8 | -833/+973 |
| | | | | | At least this particular implementation of them. Let's play with them now for a while, see if they're fully equivalent to shift/reduce. | ||||
* | 4113 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-11-05 | 1 | -288/+291 |
| | |||||
* | 4112 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-11-05 | 1 | -16/+12 |
| | |||||
* | 4110 - add continuations to docs | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-11-05 | 4 | -0/+363 |
| | |||||
* | 4109 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-11-05 | 41 | -1091/+1222 |
| | |||||
* | 4102 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-11-01 | 54 | -4738/+4816 |
| | |||||
* | 4085 - done with first cut of the SubX VM | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 2 | -3/+146 |
| | | | | subx: 'call' and 'return' instructions | ||||
* | 4084 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 3 | -95/+94 |
| | | | | | subx: extract helpers for 'push' and 'pop'. We will be using them in 'call' and 'ret' as well. | ||||
* | 4083 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 2 | -1/+60 |
| | | | | subx: 'pop' | ||||
* | 4082 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 2 | -50/+56 |
| | | | | | subx: correct a 'copy' ('mov') instruction as well to get its operand right from the opcode. | ||||
* | 4081 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 1 | -222/+218 |
| | |||||
* | 4080 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 1 | -13/+19 |
| | | | | | | | | subx: correct 'push' register. It gets its operand right from the opcode, not a new modrm byte. Have I misinterpreted any other instructions in this manner (`+rd` in the Intel manual)? | ||||
* | 4079 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 3 | -26/+101 |
| | | | | subx: 'pop' | ||||
* | 4078 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-17 | 6 | -449/+451 |
| | |||||
* | 4077 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-17 | 5 | -32/+32 |
| | | | | | Stop hyperlinking every `i` in subx html files to the integer register union. | ||||
* | 4072 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-16 | 6 | -68/+667 |
| | |||||
* | 4069 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-15 | 4 | -221/+303 |
| | | | | subx: unconditional 'jump' | ||||
* | 4068 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-15 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| | |||||
* | 4067 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-15 | 3 | -3/+92 |
| | | | | subx: 'mov' | ||||
* | 4066 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-14 | 2 | -2/+2 |
| | | | | | | I spent a while spelunking into the code generated by C compilers before realizing that ignoring the order of arguments for 'cmp' instructions clarifies everything. | ||||
* | 4065 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-14 | 3 | -0/+228 |
| | | | | | | subx: 'compare' Hopefully I've implemented the 'sense' of comparisons right.. | ||||
* | 4064 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-14 | 6 | -478/+457 |
| | |||||
* | 4063 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-14 | 2 | -4/+4 |
| | |||||
* | 4062 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-13 | 4 | -252/+256 |
| | |||||
* | 4061 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-13 | 2 | -9/+9 |
| | |||||
* | 4059 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-13 | 3 | -242/+609 |
| | |||||
* | 4054 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 9 | -369/+369 |
| | |||||
* | 4053 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 2 | -5/+5 |
| | |||||
* | 4052 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 9 | -140/+1935 |
| | |||||
* | 4028 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 1 | -4/+4 |
| | |||||
* | 4027 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 1 | -0/+249 |
| | | | | Hacky one-time html rendering for a single layer in subx. | ||||
* | 4010 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-04 | 1 | -15/+15 |
| | |||||
* | 4009 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-04 | 1 | -17/+22 |
| | | | | | Undo commit 4002 for factorial.mu, because index.html describes it as an example showing the labels '{' and '}'. | ||||
* | 4008 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-09-25 | 13 | -1276/+1283 |
| | | | | | Allow list `push` operation to save result in a new list rather than mutate the existing list. | ||||
* | 4007 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-09-25 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | |||||
* | 4006 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-09-24 | 1 | -49/+48 |
| | |||||
* | 4005 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-09-24 | 1 | -99/+103 |
| | | | | https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammingLanguages/comments/727va7/a_comparison_of_lisps/dnh2q6u | ||||
* | 4004 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-09-23 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 4003 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-09-23 | 44 | -2169/+2135 |
| | |||||
* | 4001 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-09-18 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 3998 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-09-13 | 1 | -427/+444 |
| | |||||
* | 3995 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-09-13 | 6 | -685/+738 |
| | |||||
* | 3990 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-09-03 | 40 | -515/+776 |
| | |||||
* | 3985 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-08-30 | 1 | -117/+115 |
| |