| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Still can't print non-integer numbers, so this is a bit hacky.
The big consequence is that you can't print literal characters anymore
because of our rules about how we pick which variant to statically
dispatch to. You have to save to a character variable first.
Maybe I can add an annotation to literals..
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not entirely happy with this. Maybe we'll find a better name. But at
least it's an improvement.
One part I *am* happy with is renaming string-replace to replace,
string-append to append, etc. Overdue, now that we have static dispatch.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Great that it just worked after the previous commit.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We still can't have decent tests in this variant.
Thanks Jack and Caleb Couch.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Introducing a new 'newlayer' tag like 'todo', to record places where a
nascent new layer might be starting to bud off.
|
|
|
|
| |
Now we can collect all traces, just modulating the depth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We still can't check ingredient types, and even this is still a run-time
check. We'll need to start tracking recipe signatures at some point.
I've had to introduce a hack called /skiptypecheck. Time to get generics
working.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
How the heck was this working until now?
There must be redundant moves. And was I clobbering test data?
|
| |
|
|
Thanks Jack and Caleb Couch for the idea.
|