| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
I'm currently doing this extremely naively/slowly/uglily. Not a bottleneck.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All highly experimental. Current constraints:
* No tail recursion elimination
* No heap reuse
* Keep implementation simple
So it's slow, and I don't want to complicate it to speed it up. So I'm
investing in affordances to help deal with the slowness. However, in the
process I've taken the clean abstraction of a trace ("all you need to do
is add to the trace") and bolted on call counts and debug-prints as independent
mechanisms.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
We run out of memory fairly early in the course of drawing a chessboard
on the whole screen.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It only works because the part that's truncated is cleanly the sandbox.
I need better error-checking in `read`.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mu computer now has more code in it:
(
(globals . (
(hline1 . (fn () (screen y lo hi) (if (>= lo hi) () ((fn () (pixel screen lo y 12) (hline1 screen y (+ lo 1) hi))))))
(vline1 . (fn () (screen x lo hi) (if (>= lo hi) () ((fn () (pixel screen x lo 12) (vline1 screen x (+ lo 1) hi))))))
(hline . (fn () (screen y) (hline1 screen y 0 (width screen))))
(vline . (fn () (screen y) (vline1 screen y 0 (height screen))))
(andf . (fn (a b)
(if a
(if b
1
())
())))
(brline . (fn (screen x0 y0 x1 y1)
((fn (dx dy sx sy)
((fn (err)
(brline1 screen x0 y0 x1 y1 dx dy sx sy err))
(+ dx dy)))
(abs (- x1 x0))
(- 0 (abs (- y1 y0)))
(sgn (- x1 x0))
(sgn (- y1 y0)))))
(brline1 . (fn (screen x y xmax ymax dx dy sx sy err)
(pixel screen x y 12)
(if (andf (= x xmax) (= y ymax))
()
((fn (e2)
(brline1 screen
(if (>= e2 dy)
(+ x sx)
x)
(if (<= e2 dx)
(+ y sy)
y)
xmax
ymax
dx
dy
sx
sy
(+ err
(+
(if (>= e2 dy)
dy
0)
(if (<= e2 dx)
dx
0)))))
(* err 2)))))
))
(sandbox . (brline screen 1 1 5 5))
)
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
I'm not bothering with full dynamic scope for now.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
See shell/README.md for (extremely klunky) instructions.
|
|
|
Baremetal is now the default build target and therefore has its sources
at the top-level. Baremetal programs build using the phase-2 Mu toolchain
that requires a Linux kernel. This phase-2 codebase which used to be at
the top-level is now under the linux/ directory. Finally, the phase-2 toolchain,
while self-hosting, has a way to bootstrap from a C implementation, which
is now stored in linux/bootstrap. The bootstrap C implementation uses some
literate programming tools that are now in linux/bootstrap/tools.
So the whole thing has gotten inverted. Each directory should build one
artifact and include the main sources (along with standard library). Tools
used for building it are relegated to sub-directories, even though those
tools are often useful in their own right, and have had lots of interesting
programs written using them.
A couple of things have gotten dropped in this process:
- I had old ways to run on just a Linux kernel, or with a Soso kernel.
No more.
- I had some old tooling for running a single test at the cursor. I haven't
used that lately. Maybe I'll bring it back one day.
The reorg isn't done yet. Still to do:
- redo documentation everywhere. All the README files, all other markdown,
particularly vocabulary.md.
- clean up how-to-run comments at the start of programs everywhere
- rethink what to do with the html/ directory. Do we even want to keep
supporting it?
In spite of these shortcomings, all the scripts at the top-level, linux/
and linux/bootstrap are working. The names of the scripts also feel reasonable.
This is a good milestone to take stock at.
|