about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/subx/036global_variables.cc
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* switch to new syntax for segment headers in C++Kartik Agaram2019-05-181-32/+40
|
* 5131Kartik Agaram2019-04-271-2/+2
| | | | Rename '--map' to '--debug'.
* 5001 - drop the :(scenario) DSLKartik Agaram2019-03-121-77/+112
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I've been saying for a while[1][2][3] that adding extra abstractions makes things harder for newcomers, and adding new notations doubly so. And then I notice this DSL in my own backyard. Makes me feel like a hypocrite. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13565743#13570092 [2] https://lobste.rs/s/to8wpr/configuration_files_are_canary_warning [3] https://lobste.rs/s/mdmcdi/little_languages_by_jon_bentley_1986#c_3miuf2 The implementation of the DSL was also highly hacky: a) It was happening in the tangle/ tool, but was utterly unrelated to tangling layers. b) There were several persnickety constraints on the different kinds of lines and the specific order they were expected in. I kept finding bugs where the translator would silently do the wrong thing. Or the error messages sucked, and readers may be stuck looking at the generated code to figure out what happened. Fixing error messages would require a lot more code, which is one of my arguments against DSLs in the first place: they may be easy to implement, but they're hard to design to go with the grain of the underlying platform. They require lots of iteration. Is that effort worth prioritizing in this project? On the other hand, the DSL did make at least some readers' life easier, the ones who weren't immediately put off by having to learn a strange syntax. There were fewer quotes to parse, fewer backslash escapes. Anyway, since there are also people who dislike having to put up with strange syntaxes, we'll call that consideration a wash and tear this DSL out. --- This commit was sheer drudgery. Hopefully it won't need to be redone with a new DSL because I grow sick of backslashes.
* 4987 - support `browse_trace` tool in SubXKartik Agaram2019-02-251-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I've extracted it into a separate binary, independent of my Mu prototype. I also cleaned up my tracing layer to be a little nicer. Major improvements: - Realized that incremental tracing really ought to be the default. And to minimize printing traces to screen. - Finally figured out how to combine layers and call stack frames in a single dimension of depth. The answer: optimize for the experience of `browse_trace`. Instructions occupy a range of depths based on their call stack frame, and minor details of an instruction lie one level deeper in each case. Other than that, I spent some time adjusting levels everywhere to make `browse_trace` useful.
* 4973Kartik Agaram2019-02-151-2/+32
| | | | | Support immediate operands in the data segment in all the ways we support them in the code segment.
* 4909Kartik Agaram2019-01-051-2/+2
| | | | Improve error checking to warn on unexpected displacements as well.
* 4883 - rudimentary memory allocatorKartik Agaram2018-12-281-0/+1
|
* 4874Kartik Agaram2018-12-251-0/+14
|
* 4754 - allow data segment to refer to variablesKartik Agaram2018-11-191-2/+42
|
* 4753Kartik Agaram2018-11-191-5/+5
|
* 4678Kartik Agaram2018-10-101-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | A debugging aid: 'subx --map translate' dumps a mapping from functions to addresses to a file called "map", and 'subx --map run' loads the mapping in "map", augmenting debug traces. Let's see how much this helps. Debugging machine code has been pretty painful lately.
* 4668Kartik Agaram2018-10-051-3/+3
|
* 4664 - subx: reflect test failures in exit statusKartik Agaram2018-10-051-0/+2
|
* 4661Kartik Agaram2018-10-041-1/+1
| | | | | Make segment management a little more consistent between initial segments and add-on segments (using `mmap`).
* 4640 - clear error message on missing libraryKartik Agaram2018-10-011-0/+2
|
* 4616 - fix subx/examples/ex7Kartik Agaram2018-09-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | It was broken since I added support for global variables, back on Sep 1. One other subtle thing I've improved is the name `looks_like_hex_int`. We can now distinguish in the pack-operands transform between ignoring 'foo' because it doesn't look like a number, and immediately flagging '0xfoo' as an error because it *should* be a number.
* 4614 - redo simulated RAMKartik Agaram2018-09-291-5/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | Now simulated 'Memory' isn't just a single flat array. Instead it knows about segments and VMAs. The code segment will always be first, and the data/heap segment will always be second. The brk() syscall knows about the data segment. One nice side-effect is that I no longer need to mess with Memory initialization regardless of where I place my segments.
* 4544Kartik Agaram2018-09-121-21/+62
| | | | | | | | Attempt #3 at fixing CI. In the process the feature gets a lot less half-baked. Ridiculously misleading that we had `has_metadata()` was special-cased to one specific transform. I suck.
* 4543Kartik Agaram2018-09-121-6/+31
| | | | | | | Really fix CI. Also realized we don't need to worry about function pointers. They won't be in /disp32 fields.
* 4542Kartik Agaram2018-09-121-2/+2
| | | | Fix CI (`subx translate examples/ex6.subx examples/ex6`)
* 4535 - support for global variable namesKartik Agaram2018-09-011-0/+111