| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | 5102 | Kartik Agaram | 2019-04-16 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | | |||||
| * | 5084 | Kartik Agaram | 2019-04-11 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | |||||
| * | 5011 | Kartik Agaram | 2019-03-20 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | | | | | | | | New convention: compare 'with' for asymmetric comparisons (greater or lesser than), and compare 'and' for symmetric comparisons. Worth making this distinction even though the opcodes are identical; when we compare 'with', the order of operands is significant. | ||||
| * | 5009 | Kartik Agaram | 2019-03-20 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | |||||
| * | 4981 - no, go back to 3 phases | Kartik Agaram | 2019-02-18 | 1 | -2/+1 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Considering how much trouble a merge phase would be (commit 4978), it seems simpler to just add the extra syntax for controlling the entry point of the generated ELF binary. But I wouldn't have noticed this if I hadn't taken the time to write out the commit messages of 4976 and 4978. Even if we happened to already have linked list primitives built, this may still be a good idea considering that I'm saving quite a lot of code in duplicated entrypoints. | ||||
| * | 4965 | Kartik Agaram | 2019-02-14 | 1 | -25/+31 |
| | | |||||
| * | 4961 | Kartik Agaram | 2019-02-14 | 1 | -18/+25 |
| | | |||||
| * | 4933 | Kartik Agaram | 2019-01-16 | 1 | -19/+19 |
| | | |||||
| * | 4911 | Kartik Agaram | 2019-01-06 | 1 | -8/+8 |
| | | |||||
| * | 4901 | Kartik Agaram | 2019-01-03 | 1 | -0/+170 |