| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Start using the new newline escape in string literals everywhere.
I could use it more aggressively, but it makes tests harder to read. So
only one line of text per string for now.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fail early when writing to a fake file runs out of space. Makes debugging
tests easier.
Reads from files, on the other hand, are only buffering to a temporary
stream, so it makes sense to silently stop when they run out of space.
In the process I uncovered a testing bug in pack.subx: I was missing a
trailing space in the expected result, but the test still passed because
the space was getting truncated. Being principled about aborting on overflow
by default will help avoid such issues.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
write-stream-buffered isn't a clean abstraction. Ignoring the 'read' index
of a stream is a hack. It's just saving us the trouble of a rewind-stream.
So make it a helper of pack.subx rather than part of the standard library.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Testing conversion of multiple lines in a data segment.
Bugs fixed:
1. Stack issues in next-token helpers.
2. Needed to teach next-token to avoid newlines.
3. rewind-stream(line) before passing it to convert-code or convert-instruction.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix CI. pack.subx was passing in emulation but not natively.
Commit 4954 on Feb 10 was a real dud. First I find I forgot to reclaim
space for locals (commit 4996). Now I find I haven't been tracking registers
properly either.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Yet another redrawing of responsibilities between convert and its helpers.
In the process I discovered a bug in `write-stream-buffered` which ended
up taking me through a detour to extract `browse_trace` into its own tool.
It turns out just having long buffers is enough to need browse_trace. Simple
operations like clearing a stream swamp a flat view of the trace.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Considering how much trouble a merge phase would be (commit 4978), it seems
simpler to just add the extra syntax for controlling the entry point of
the generated ELF binary.
But I wouldn't have noticed this if I hadn't taken the time to write out
the commit messages of 4976 and 4978.
Even if we happened to already have linked list primitives built, this
may still be a good idea considering that I'm saving quite a lot of code
in duplicated entrypoints.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Starting to build up Phase 2 (apps/pack) out of recently designed primitives.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Cleaner way to compare streams in tests.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Clean up primitives for converting from/to hex chars.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
We want slice-equal? for length-prefixed strings, not null-terminated "kernel"
strings.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
In the process of building slice primitives I found an out-of-bounds access
in write-byte.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix CI.
a) Update canonical binaries.
b) Fix an out-of-bounds access in `clear-stream`. This also required supporting
a new instruction in `subx run` to load an imm8 into rm8.
|
| |
|
|
| |
We only can't use rm32=5 when mod=0. Totally fine when it's mod=1.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
More mnemonic register usage in write-stream.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Our first buffer overflow!
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm imagining 3 core stages total:
1. convert text hex bytes -> binary (✓)
2. pack and reorder operands
3. compute label addresses
(Not including extras like error-checking.)
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fix CI.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bugfix in scenarios where scan-next-byte needs to abort.
I'm starting to have trouble keeping strings, streams and buffered-files
straight.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Clean up a few things:
a) Call scan-next-byte in hex.subx with the right number of args. Turns
out tests continue to work fine if they never use the other args.
b) Tear down a test for 'stop' in the right order. Not important since we
have no EBP to restore. But can still be misleading.
c) Have 'check-ints-equal' return nothing. Handy for it to not mess up
EAX. I never use the result anyway, and the name also is imperative suggesting
callers won't expect a return value.
|
|
|
Making progress on hex1 (http://web.archive.org/web/20061108010907/http://www.rano.org/bcompiler.html)
|