| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Fix CI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Done with kinda-safe pointers.
In a real compiler the fast path of 'lookup' would ideally get inlined.
Excluding procedure-call overhead, the current implementation consumes 2
registers besides the input, and requires 9 instructions (2 push, 2 load,
compare, jump, increment, 2 pop). That's large enough that inlining may
become a trade-off. Even if we somehow magically had the registers already
loaded and available, we'd still need 4 instructions (1 pointer dereference,
compare, jump and increment). The price of safety.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
We only can't use rm32=5 when mod=0. Totally fine when it's mod=1.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Make dots a little more salient on a light-background Vim.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Symlink or append exuberant_ctags_rc to your ~/.ctagsrc.
|
|
|
|
| |
Experimenting with a light background colorscheme.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't treat this as a section comment:
e8/call foo # -1 is negative
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
More mnemonic register usage in write-stream.
|
|
|
|
| |
Our first buffer overflow!
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm imagining 3 core stages total:
1. convert text hex bytes -> binary (✓)
2. pack and reorder operands
3. compute label addresses
(Not including extras like error-checking.)
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Clean up the debugging flow, and go over help messages for inconsistencies.
They predate the new Readme, which takes some time to describe the x86
instruction set.
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix CI.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bugfix in scenarios where scan-next-byte needs to abort.
I'm starting to have trouble keeping strings, streams and buffered-files
straight.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Clean up a few things:
a) Call scan-next-byte in hex.subx with the right number of args. Turns
out tests continue to work fine if they never use the other args.
b) Tear down a test for 'stop' in the right order. Not important since we
have no EBP to restore. But can still be misleading.
c) Have 'check-ints-equal' return nothing. Handy for it to not mess up
EAX. I never use the result anyway, and the name also is imperative suggesting
callers won't expect a return value.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Making progress on hex1 (http://web.archive.org/web/20061108010907/http://www.rano.org/bcompiler.html)
|
|
|
|
| |
Colorize function names containing special characters like '?'.
|
| |
|