1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
|
//: The goal of this skeleton is to make programs more easy to understand and
//: more malleable, easy to rewrite in radical ways without accidentally
//: breaking some corner case. Tests further both goals. They help
//: understandability by letting one make small changes and get feedback. What
//: if I wrote this line like so? What if I removed this function call, is it
//: really necessary? Just try it, see if the tests pass. Want to explore
//: rewriting this bit in this way? Tests put many refactorings on a firmer
//: footing.
//:
//: But the usual way we write tests seems incomplete. Refactorings tend to
//: work in the small, but don't help with changes to function boundaries. If
//: you want to extract a new function you have to manually test-drive it to
//: create tests for it. If you want to inline a function its tests are no
//: longer valid. In both cases you end up having to reorganize code as well as
//: tests, an error-prone activity.
//:
//: This file tries to fix this problem by supporting domain-driven testing
//: We try to focus on the domain of inputs the program should work on. All
//: tests invoke the program in a single way: by calling run() with different
//: inputs. The program operates on the input and logs _facts_ it deduces to a
//: trace:
//: trace("label") << "fact 1: " << val;
//:
//: The tests check for facts:
//: :(scenario foo)
//: 34 # call run() with this input
//: +label: fact 1: 34 # trace should have logged this at the end
//: -label: fact 1: 35 # trace should never contain such a line
//:
//: Since we never call anything but the run() function directly, we never have
//: to rewrite the tests when we reorganize the internals of the program. We
//: just have to make sure our rewrite deduces the same facts about the domain,
//: and that's something we're going to have to do anyway.
//:
//: To avoid the combinatorial explosion of integration tests, we organize the
//: program into different layers, and each fact is logged to the trace with a
//: specific label. Individual tests can focus on specific labels. In essence,
//: validating the facts logged with a specific label is identical to calling
//: some internal subsystem.
//:
//: Traces interact salubriously with layers. Thanks to our ordering
//: directives, each layer can contain its own tests. They may rely on other
//: layers, but when a test fails its usually due to breakage in the same
//: layer. When multiple tests fail, it's usually useful to debug the very
//: first test to fail. This is in contrast with the traditional approach,
//: where changes can cause breakages in faraway subsystems, and picking the
//: right test to debug can be an important skill to pick up.
//:
//: To build robust tests, trace facts about your domain rather than details of
//: how you computed them.
//:
//: More details: http://akkartik.name/blog/tracing-tests
//:
//: ---
//:
//: Between layers and domain-driven testing, programming starts to look like a
//: fundamentally different activity. Instead of a) superficial, b) local rules
//: on c) code [like http://blog.bbv.ch/2013/06/05/clean-code-cheat-sheet],
//: we allow programmers to engage with the a) deep, b) global structure of the
//: c) domain. If you can systematically track discontinuities in the domain
//: you don't care if the code used gotos as long as it passed the tests. If
//: tests become more robust to run it becomes easier to try out radically
//: different implementations for the same program. If code is super-easy to
//: rewrite, it becomes less important what indentation style it uses, or that
//: the objects are appropriately encapsulated, or that the functions are
//: referentially transparent.
//:
//: Instead of plumbing, programming becomes building and gradually refining a
//: map of the environment the program must operate under. Whether a program is
//: 'correct' at a given point in time is a red herring; what matters is
//: avoiding regression by monotonically nailing down the more 'eventful' parts
//: of the terrain. It helps readers new and old and rewards curiosity to
//: organize large programs in self-similar hiearchies of example scenarios
//: colocated with the code that makes them work.
//:
//: "Programming properly should be regarded as an activity by which
//: programmers form a mental model, rather than as production of a program."
//: -- Peter Naur (http://alistair.cockburn.us/ASD+book+extract%3A+%22Naur,+Ehn,+Musashi%22)
:(before "int main")
// End Tracing // hack to ensure most code in this layer comes before anything else
:(before "End Types")
struct trace_line {
int depth; // optional field just to help browse traces later
string label;
string contents;
trace_line(string l, string c) :depth(0), label(l), contents(c) {}
trace_line(int d, string l, string c) :depth(d), label(l), contents(c) {}
};
:(before "End Globals")
const int Max_depth = 9999;
const int Error_depth = 0; // definitely always print the error that caused death
const int Warning_depth = 1;
const int App_depth = 2; // temporarily where all mu code will trace to
:(before "End Tracing")
bool Hide_errors = false;
bool Hide_warnings = false;
:(before "End Setup")
Hide_errors = false;
Hide_warnings = false;
:(before "End Tracing")
struct trace_stream {
vector<trace_line> past_lines;
// accumulator for current line
ostringstream* curr_stream;
string curr_label;
int curr_depth;
int callstack_depth;
int collect_depth;
ofstream null_stream; // never opens a file, so writes silently fail
trace_stream() :curr_stream(NULL), curr_depth(Max_depth), callstack_depth(0), collect_depth(Max_depth) {}
~trace_stream() { if (curr_stream) delete curr_stream; }
ostream& stream(string label) {
return stream(Max_depth, label);
}
ostream& stream(int depth, string label) {
if (depth > collect_depth) return null_stream;
curr_stream = new ostringstream;
curr_label = label;
curr_depth = depth;
return *curr_stream;
}
// be sure to call this before messing with curr_stream or curr_label
void newline() {
if (!curr_stream) return;
string curr_contents = curr_stream->str();
if (curr_contents.empty()) return;
past_lines.push_back(trace_line(curr_depth, trim(curr_label), curr_contents)); // preserve indent in contents
if (!Hide_errors && curr_label == "error")
cerr << curr_label << ": " << curr_contents << '\n';
else if (!Hide_warnings && curr_label == "warn")
cerr << curr_label << ": " << curr_contents << '\n';
delete curr_stream;
curr_stream = NULL;
curr_label.clear();
curr_depth = Max_depth;
}
// Useful for debugging.
string readable_contents(string label) { // missing label = everything
ostringstream output;
label = trim(label);
for (vector<trace_line>::iterator p = past_lines.begin(); p != past_lines.end(); ++p)
if (label.empty() || label == p->label) {
output << std::setw(4) << p->depth << ' ' << p->label << ": " << p->contents << '\n';
}
return output.str();
}
};
trace_stream* Trace_stream = NULL;
// Top-level helper. IMPORTANT: can't nest.
#define trace(...) !Trace_stream ? cerr /*print nothing*/ : Trace_stream->stream(__VA_ARGS__)
#define raise (!Trace_stream ? (tb_shutdown(),cerr) /*do print*/ : Trace_stream->stream(Warning_depth, "warn"))
#define raise_error (!Trace_stream ? (tb_shutdown(),cerr) /*do print*/ : Trace_stream->stream(Error_depth, "error"))
:(before "End Types")
struct end {};
:(before "End Tracing")
ostream& operator<<(ostream& os, unused end) {
if (Trace_stream) Trace_stream->newline();
return os;
}
#define CLEAR_TRACE delete Trace_stream, Trace_stream = new trace_stream;
#define DUMP(label) if (Trace_stream) cerr << Trace_stream->readable_contents(label);
// All scenarios save their traces in the repo, just like code. This gives
// future readers more meat when they try to make sense of a new project.
static string Trace_dir = ".traces/";
string Trace_file;
// Trace_stream is a resource, lease_tracer uses RAII to manage it.
struct lease_tracer {
lease_tracer() { Trace_stream = new trace_stream; }
~lease_tracer() {
if (!Trace_stream) return; // in case tests close Trace_stream
if (!Trace_file.empty()) {
ofstream fout((Trace_dir+Trace_file).c_str());
fout << Trace_stream->readable_contents("");
fout.close();
}
delete Trace_stream, Trace_stream = NULL, Trace_file = "";
}
};
#define START_TRACING_UNTIL_END_OF_SCOPE lease_tracer leased_tracer;
:(before "End Test Setup")
START_TRACING_UNTIL_END_OF_SCOPE
:(before "End Includes")
#define CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS(...) check_trace_contents(__FUNCTION__, __FILE__, __LINE__, __VA_ARGS__)
:(before "End Tracing")
bool check_trace_contents(string FUNCTION, string FILE, int LINE, string expected) {
if (!Trace_stream) return false;
vector<string> expected_lines = split(expected, "");
long long int curr_expected_line = 0;
while (curr_expected_line < SIZE(expected_lines) && expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line).empty())
++curr_expected_line;
if (curr_expected_line == SIZE(expected_lines)) return true;
string label, contents;
split_label_contents(expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line), &label, &contents);
for (vector<trace_line>::iterator p = Trace_stream->past_lines.begin(); p != Trace_stream->past_lines.end(); ++p) {
if (label != p->label)
continue;
if (contents != trim(p->contents))
continue;
++curr_expected_line;
while (curr_expected_line < SIZE(expected_lines) && expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line).empty())
++curr_expected_line;
if (curr_expected_line == SIZE(expected_lines)) return true;
split_label_contents(expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line), &label, &contents);
}
++Num_failures;
cerr << "\nF - " << FUNCTION << "(" << FILE << ":" << LINE << "): missing [" << contents << "] in trace:\n";
DUMP(label);
Passed = false;
return false;
}
void split_label_contents(const string& s, string* label, string* contents) {
static const string delim(": ");
size_t pos = s.find(delim);
if (pos == string::npos) {
*label = "";
*contents = trim(s);
}
else {
*label = trim(s.substr(0, pos));
*contents = trim(s.substr(pos+SIZE(delim)));
}
}
int trace_count(string label) {
return trace_count(label, "");
}
int trace_count(string label, string line) {
long result = 0;
for (vector<trace_line>::iterator p = Trace_stream->past_lines.begin(); p != Trace_stream->past_lines.end(); ++p) {
if (label == p->label) {
if (line == "" || trim(line) == trim(p->contents))
++result;
}
}
return result;
}
#define CHECK_TRACE_CONTAINS_ERROR() CHECK(trace_count("error") > 0)
#define CHECK_TRACE_DOESNT_CONTAIN_ERROR() \
if (trace_count("error") > 0) { \
++Num_failures; \
cerr << "\nF - " << __FUNCTION__ << "(" << __FILE__ << ":" << __LINE__ << "): unexpected errors\n"; \
DUMP("error"); \
Passed = false; \
return; \
}
#define CHECK_TRACE_COUNT(label, count) \
if (trace_count(label) != (count)) { \
++Num_failures; \
cerr << "\nF - " << __FUNCTION__ << "(" << __FILE__ << ":" << __LINE__ << "): trace_count of " << label << " should be " << count << '\n'; \
cerr << " got " << trace_count(label) << '\n'; /* multiple eval */ \
DUMP(label); \
Passed = false; \
return; /* Currently we stop at the very first failure. */ \
}
bool trace_doesnt_contain(string label, string line) {
return trace_count(label, line) == 0;
}
bool trace_doesnt_contain(string expected) {
vector<string> tmp = split_first(expected, ": ");
return trace_doesnt_contain(tmp.at(0), tmp.at(1));
}
#define CHECK_TRACE_DOESNT_CONTAIN(...) CHECK(trace_doesnt_contain(__VA_ARGS__))
vector<string> split(string s, string delim) {
vector<string> result;
size_t begin=0, end=s.find(delim);
while (true) {
if (end == string::npos) {
result.push_back(string(s, begin, string::npos));
break;
}
result.push_back(string(s, begin, end-begin));
begin = end+SIZE(delim);
end = s.find(delim, begin);
}
return result;
}
vector<string> split_first(string s, string delim) {
vector<string> result;
size_t end=s.find(delim);
result.push_back(string(s, 0, end));
if (end != string::npos)
result.push_back(string(s, end+SIZE(delim), string::npos));
return result;
}
string trim(const string& s) {
string::const_iterator first = s.begin();
while (first != s.end() && isspace(*first))
++first;
if (first == s.end()) return "";
string::const_iterator last = --s.end();
while (last != s.begin() && isspace(*last))
--last;
++last;
return string(first, last);
}
:(before "End Includes")
#include<vector>
using std::vector;
#include<list>
using std::list;
#include<map>
using std::map;
#include<set>
using std::set;
#include<algorithm>
#include<iostream>
using std::istream;
using std::ostream;
using std::cin;
using std::cout;
using std::cerr;
#include<iomanip>
#include<sstream>
using std::istringstream;
using std::ostringstream;
#include<fstream>
using std::ifstream;
using std::ofstream;
#include"termbox/termbox.h"
#define unused __attribute__((unused))
:(before "End Globals")
//: In future layers we'll use the depth field as follows:
//:
//: Errors will be depth 0.
//: Warnings will be depth 1.
//: Mu 'applications' will be able to use depths 2-100 as they like.
//: Primitive statements will occupy 101-9989
const int Initial_callstack_depth = 101;
const int Max_callstack_depth = 9989;
//: Finally, details of primitive mu statements will occupy depth 9990-9999 (more on that later as well)
//:
//: This framework should help us hide some details at each level, mixing
//: static ideas like layers with the dynamic notion of call-stack depth.
|