blob: 0a5878cf85f1f54458a7ce7b34f1c51a7b84b258 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
|
//: So far we have local variables, and we can nest local variables of short
//: lifetimes inside longer ones. Now let's support 'global' variables that
//: last for the life of a routine. If we create multiple routines they won't
//: have access to each other's globals.
//:
//: This feature is still experimental and half-baked. You can't name global
//: variables, and so like in most tests they don't get checked for types (the
//: only known hole in the type system, can cause memory corruption). We might
//: fix these issues if we ever use globals. Or we might just drop the feature
//: entirely.
:(scenario global_space)
def main [
# pretend shared:array:location; in practice we'll use new
10:number <- copy 0 # refcount
11:number <- copy 5 # length
# pretend shared:array:location; in practice we'll use new
20:number <- copy 0 # refcount
21:number <- copy 5 # length
# actual start of this recipe
global-space:address:shared:array:location <- copy 20/unsafe
default-space:address:shared:array:location <- copy 10/unsafe
1:number <- copy 23
1:number/space:global <- copy 24
]
# store to default space: 10 + /*skip refcount*/1 + /*skip length*/1 + /*index*/1
+mem: storing 23 in location 13
# store to chained space: /*contents of location 12*/20 + /*skip refcount*/1 + /*skip length*/1 + /*index*/1
+mem: storing 24 in location 23
//: to support it, create another special variable called global space
:(before "End is_disqualified Cases")
if (x.name == "global-space")
x.initialized = true;
:(before "End is_special_name Cases")
if (s == "global-space") return true;
//: writes to this variable go to a field in the current routine
:(before "End routine Fields")
int global_space;
:(before "End routine Constructor")
global_space = 0;
:(after "void write_memory(reagent x, const vector<double>& data)")
if (x.name == "global-space") {
if (!scalar(data)
|| !x.type
|| x.type->value != get(Type_ordinal, "address")
|| !x.type->right
|| x.type->right->value != get(Type_ordinal, "shared")
|| !x.type->right->right
|| x.type->right->right->value != get(Type_ordinal, "array")
|| !x.type->right->right->right
|| x.type->right->right->right->value != get(Type_ordinal, "location")
|| x.type->right->right->right->right) {
raise << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "'global-space' should be of type address:shared:array:location, but tried to write " << to_string(data) << '\n' << end();
}
if (Current_routine->global_space)
raise << "routine already has a global-space; you can't over-write your globals" << end();
Current_routine->global_space = data.at(0);
return;
}
//: now marking variables as /space:global looks them up inside this field
:(after "int space_base(const reagent& x)")
if (is_global(x)) {
if (!Current_routine->global_space)
raise << "routine has no global space\n" << end();
return Current_routine->global_space + /*skip refcount*/1;
}
//: for now let's not bother giving global variables names.
//: don't want to make them too comfortable to use.
:(scenario global_space_with_names)
def main [
global-space:address:shared:array:location <- new location:type, 10
x:number <- copy 23
1:number/space:global <- copy 24
]
# don't complain about mixing numeric addresses and names
$error: 0
:(after "bool is_numeric_location(const reagent& x)")
if (is_global(x)) return false;
//: helpers
:(code)
bool is_global(const reagent& x) {
for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(x.properties); ++i) {
if (x.properties.at(i).first == "space")
return x.properties.at(i).second && x.properties.at(i).second->value == "global";
}
return false;
}
|