| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
| |
They aren't evaluating strings after all.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This is for what the app does, as opposed to 'doc:main', which is also
intended to include commentary about the internal organization of the
app.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When I started logging getch() events (which are just to help the reader
orient on the log), this suddenly became more urgent.
Now the log is larger, and it's also a circular buffer that rolls back
to the start when it fills up.
The next failure mode will be if we see the buffer filled up with just
getch() calls, reducing visibility over real file and network
operations. In which case we'll need to start coalescing getch() events.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
This will eliminate some spurious git diffs I keep having to clean up.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The problem I'm running into is that apps might want to perform their
own editing. So I can't take up prime estate like the ctrl-e hotkey or a
menu name of 'edit'.
I'm still prioritizing rendering Teliva's edit and permissions menu. If
the window is too narrow the app's settings will be overwritten and
Teliva's hotkeys will be preferentially displayed. Seems safer.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Now we can be sure apps can't call `require`.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Just like with `require`, we don't we don't know how to sandbox it.
(Though we still have `require` because standard libraries outside apps
need it. I need to make sure apps can't invoke `require`..)
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
How many levels of macros do we need. Also stop lying that we're using
Linux in BSD.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I've never tested with it, and it is likely broken after all my changes
to base Lua 5.1. Might as well be transparent about that.
If you care about this platform, please let me know:
http://akkartik.name/contact
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
It's not clear to me where my Linux gets strlcpy and strlcat from
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Submitted upstream at https://github.com/antirez/kilo/pull/81.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'd already dropped the variant without a filename. But even the variant
with a filename is very easy to use in a way that is confusing to use in
the presence of sandboxing:
* call io.lines()
* Sandboxing saves an error, io.lines() returns nil
* Caller (usually a loop) raises an error.
* We show the error and not the sandboxing failure.
* Worse, there's no way to adjust permissions from within Teliva,
because we can't ever get to that menu while there's an error.
Best solution I can come up with: encourage a separate step for
translating filename to file handle. That way it's more obvious that we
need to check for errors.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This will help people cross-correlate when the app performs specific
calls.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
To sandbox apps robustly, we're going to need to always work with
canonical absolute paths.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I fucking hate feature macros. Egregious discharge of our
division-of-labor-obsessed society. People should be able to introduce
names. People should be able to give up names to lower levels of
abstraction when they encounter conflicts.
Feature macros seem to exist[1] to support more than two levels of
abstraction. You try to build, one of your libraries fails to build
because of a conflict between it and one level down. You don't want to
modify this library. Just fucking https://catern.com/change_code.html
already. But no, I have to litter my code with feature macros even
though I just want the abstraction the original library provides.
[1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/feature_test_macros.7.html
https://lwn.net/Articles/590381
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
https://github.com/keplerproject/luafilesystem
The new commander.tlv app demonstrates it working.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Forgot to include some hunks.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
I made the changes reverted here out of a mistaken sense that
big-picture edits would interfere with Teliva's memory of what is
currently being edited (teliva_editor_state).
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Previously we weren't dynamically selecting how to highlight a buffer
after navigating with ctrl-g. That should work now.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Going to big picture from doc:bp still goes to the default
auto-generated big picture view.
While doc:bp provides some programmability, it's also far klunkier than
the default view. Rendering is worse, and it's always in edit mode
because I'm trying to avoid complicating the UX with a notion of
rendered markup. That means cursor movement is less convenient. It's
also easy to accidentally edit the big-picture view.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
These are just hints that there's something worth jumping to. The
jumping still happens using ctrl-g.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
I've always found "Documentation" too pretentious.
|
| |
|
|
| |
This is long overdue.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
First step: when a "definition" starts with "doc:" it's not a
definition, just a buffer. Stop trying to interpret it as Lua.
|