| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
It'll only work after LÖVE v12 comes out.
|
|
|
|
| |
The old name was confusing, as its description showed.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I want the words to be easy to read, and to use a consistent tense.
update and focus seem more timeless; let's make everything like those.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
integrated from pong.love via text.love:
https://merveilles.town/@akkartik/108933336531898243
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's still a bit simple-minded. Most software will keep the first bound
fixed and move the second. Lines currently has the bounds in a queue of
sorts. But I have a test to indicate the behavior that is definitely
desired. We'll see if we need it to get more complex.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I spent some time trying to reduce the duplication between identical
operations with and without the shift key pressed. However it makes
things harder to understand. If you try to process selection in
App.keychord_pressed in main.lua, you have to sometimes process the
selection before (e.g. including the state of the cursor _before_ an
arrow key takes effect), and sometimes after (e.g. copying the selection
before resetting it, even though it doesn't include a shift key)
Let's just leave things as they are.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tests still have a lot of side-effects on the real screen. We'll
gradually clean those up.
|
|
For shift we'll mostly rely on love.textinput. For the rest I've created
a simple driver.
|