| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
We're patching line_cache and then immediately clearing it using
Text.redraw_all.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Each one should provide a message that will show up within LÖVE. Stop
relying on nearby prints to the terminal.
I also found some unnecessary ones.
There is some potential here for performance regressions: the format()
calls will trigger whether or not the assertion fails, and cause
allocations. So far Lua's GC seems good enough to manage the load even
with Moby Dick, even in some situations that caused issues in the past
like undo.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Disquieting that none of my tests caught these. On the other hand, I
also haven't noticed any issues in practice. Perhaps cache invalidation
is often unnecessary.
|
|
|
|
| |
I have no idea what the performance implications of this are..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- record_undo_event
- undo_event
- redo_event
- snapshot
|
|
|
|
| |
We're still accessing them through a global. But we'll change that next.
|
|
|
|
| |
Now we just disallow that entirely.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now the bottleneck shifts to applying undo/redo in large files. But
things should be snappy if you don't use the sluggish feature.
|
| |
|
|
Incredibly inefficient, but I don't yet know how to efficiently encode
undo mutations that can span multiple lines.
There seems to be one bug related to creating new drawings; they're not
spawning events and undoing past drawing creation has some weird
artifacts. Redo seems to consistently work, though.
|