tc_displayable.py « test - ranger - mirror of ranger

blob: 72e0507dd7fdecc164b287aad69451050ef475e1 (plain) (tree)

ce1ae48f ^

ec823be0 ^

1159f9ec ^

f7819821 ^

85fd5288 ^

1159f9ec ^

dd4a4145 ^

1159f9ec ^

dd4a4145 ^

1159f9ec ^

dd4a4145 ^

1159f9ec ^

e3e37e3f ^

1159f9ec ^

dd4a4145 ^

95947388 ^

1159f9ec ^

f7819821 ^

1159f9ec ^

152823d8 ^

1c72dd08 ^

152823d8 ^

1c72dd08 ^

152823d8 ^

1c72dd08 ^

152823d8 ^

1159f9ec ^

1159f9ec ^

dd4a4145 ^

1159f9ec ^

dd4a4145 ^

1159f9ec ^

dd4a4145 ^

1159f9ec ^

dd4a4145 ^

1159f9ec ^

1159f9ec generated by cgit-pink 1.4.1-2-gfad0 (git 2.36.2.497.gbbea4dcf42) at 2024-11-04 23:36:40 +0000

> cannot_modify_address_inside_immutable_ingredients_2) container foo [ x:&:@:num # contains an address ] def main [ # don't run anything ] def foo a:&:foo [ local-scope load-ingredients b:foo <- merge 0 # modify b, completely unrelated to immutable ingredient a x:&:@:num <- get b, x:offset *x <- put-index *x, 0, 34 ] $error: 0 :(scenario cannot_modify_address_inside_immutable_ingredients_3) % Hide_errors = true; def main [ # don't run anything ] def foo a:&:@:&:num [ local-scope load-ingredients x:&:num <- index *a, 0 # just a regular index of the array *x <- copy 34 # but then modify the result ] +error: foo: cannot modify 'x' in instruction '*x <- copy 34' because that would modify a which is an ingredient of recipe foo but not also a product :(scenario cannot_modify_address_inside_immutable_ingredients_4) def main [ # don't run anything ] def foo a:&:@:&:num [ local-scope load-ingredients b:&:@:&:num <- new {(address number): type}, 3 # modify b, completely unrelated to immutable ingredient a x:&:num <- index *b, 0 *x <- copy 34 ] $error: 0 :(scenario latter_ingredient_of_index_is_immutable) def main [ # don't run anything ] def foo a:&:@:&:@:num, b:num -> a:&:@:&:@:num [ local-scope load-ingredients x:&:@:num <- index *a, b *x <- put-index *x, 0, 34 ] $error: 0 :(scenario can_traverse_immutable_ingredients) container test-list [ next:&:test-list ] def main [ local-scope p:&:test-list <- new test-list:type foo p ] def foo p:&:test-list [ local-scope load-ingredients p2:&:test-list <- bar p ] def bar x:&:test-list -> y:&:test-list [ local-scope load-ingredients y <- get *x, next:offset ] $error: 0 :(scenario treat_optional_ingredients_as_mutable) def main [ k:&:num <- new number:type test k ] # recipe taking an immutable address ingredient def test k:&:num [ local-scope load-ingredients foo k ] # ..calling a recipe with an optional address ingredient def foo -> [ local-scope load-ingredients k:&:num, found?:bool <- next-ingredient # we don't further check k for immutability, but assume it's mutable ] $error: 0 :(scenario treat_optional_ingredients_as_mutable_2) % Hide_errors = true; def main [ local-scope p:&:point <- new point:type foo p ] def foo p:&:point [ local-scope load-ingredients bar p ] def bar [ local-scope load-ingredients p:&:point <- next-ingredient # optional ingredient; assumed to be mutable ] +error: foo: cannot modify 'p' in instruction 'bar p' because it's an ingredient of recipe foo but not also a product //: when checking for immutable ingredients, remember to take space into account :(scenario check_space_of_reagents_in_immutability_checks) def main [ a:space <- new-closure b:&:num <- new number:type run-closure b:&:num, a:space ] def new-closure [ new-default-space x:&:num <- new number:type return default-space ] def run-closure x:&:num, s:space [ local-scope load-ingredients 0:space/names:new-closure <- copy s # different space; always mutable *x:&:num/space:1 <- copy 34 ] $error: 0 :(before "End Transforms") Transform.push_back(check_immutable_ingredients); // idempotent :(code) void check_immutable_ingredients(const recipe_ordinal r) { // to ensure an address reagent isn't modified, it suffices to show that // a) we never write to its contents directly, // b) we never call 'put' or 'put-index' on it, and // c) any non-primitive recipe calls in the body aren't returning it as a product const recipe& caller = get(Recipe, r); trace(9991, "transform") << "--- check mutability of ingredients in recipe " << caller.name << end(); if (!caller.has_header) return; // skip check for old-style recipes calling next-ingredient directly for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(caller.ingredients); ++i) { const reagent& current_ingredient = caller.ingredients.at(i); if (is_present_in_products(caller, current_ingredient.name)) continue; // not expected to be immutable // End Immutable Ingredients Special-cases set<reagent> immutable_vars; immutable_vars.insert(current_ingredient); for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(caller.steps); ++i) { const instruction& inst = caller.steps.at(i); check_immutable_ingredient_in_instruction(inst, immutable_vars, current_ingredient.name, caller); if (inst.operation == INDEX && inst.ingredients.at(1).name == current_ingredient.name) continue; update_aliases(inst, immutable_vars); } } } void update_aliases(const instruction& inst, set<reagent>& current_ingredient_and_aliases) { set<int> current_ingredient_indices = ingredient_indices(inst, current_ingredient_and_aliases); if (!contains_key(Recipe, inst.operation)) { // primitive recipe switch (inst.operation) { case COPY: for (set<int>::iterator p = current_ingredient_indices.begin(); p != current_ingredient_indices.end(); ++p) current_ingredient_and_aliases.insert(inst.products.at(*p).name); break; case GET: case INDEX: case MAYBE_CONVERT: // current_ingredient_indices can only have 0 or one value if (!current_ingredient_indices.empty()) { if (is_mu_address(inst.products.at(0)) || is_mu_container(inst.products.at(0)) || is_mu_exclusive_container(inst.products.at(0))) current_ingredient_and_aliases.insert(inst.products.at(0)); } break; default: break; } } else { // defined recipe set<int> contained_in_product_indices = scan_contained_in_product_indices(inst, current_ingredient_indices); for (set<int>::iterator p = contained_in_product_indices.begin(); p != contained_in_product_indices.end(); ++p) { if (*p < SIZE(inst.products)) current_ingredient_and_aliases.insert(inst.products.at(*p)); } } } set<int> scan_contained_in_product_indices(const instruction& inst, set<int>& ingredient_indices) { set<reagent> selected_ingredients; const recipe& callee = get(Recipe, inst.operation); for (set<int>::iterator p = ingredient_indices.begin(); p != ingredient_indices.end(); ++p) { if (*p >= SIZE(callee.ingredients)) continue; // optional immutable ingredient selected_ingredients.insert(callee.ingredients.at(*p)); } set<int> result; for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(callee.products); ++i) { const reagent& current_product = callee.products.at(i); // TODO const string_tree* contained_in_name = property(current_product, "contained-in"); if (contained_in_name && selected_ingredients.find(contained_in_name->value) != selected_ingredients.end()) result.insert(i); } return result; } :(scenarios transform) :(scenario immutability_infects_contained_in_variables) % Hide_errors = true; container test-list [ value:num next:&:test-list ] def main [ local-scope p:&:test-list <- new test-list:type foo p ] def foo p:&:test-list [ # p is immutable local-scope load-ingredients p2:&:test-list <- test-next p # p2 is immutable *p2 <- put *p2, value:offset, 34 ] def test-next x:&:test-list -> y:&:test-list/contained-in:x [ local-scope load-ingredients y <- get *x, next:offset ] +error: foo: cannot modify 'p2' in instruction '*p2 <- put *p2, value:offset, 34' because that would modify p which is an ingredient of recipe foo but not also a product :(code) void check_immutable_ingredient_in_instruction(const instruction& inst, const set<reagent>& current_ingredient_and_aliases, const string& original_ingredient_name, const recipe& caller) { // first check if the instruction is directly modifying something it shouldn't for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(inst.products); ++i) { if (has_property(inst.products.at(i), "lookup") && current_ingredient_and_aliases.find(inst.products.at(i)) != current_ingredient_and_aliases.end()) { string current_product_name = inst.products.at(i).name; if (current_product_name == original_ingredient_name) raise << maybe(caller.name) << "cannot modify '" << current_product_name << "' in instruction '" << inst.original_string << "' because it's an ingredient of recipe " << caller.name << " but not also a product\n" << end(); else raise << maybe(caller.name) << "cannot modify '" << current_product_name << "' in instruction '" << inst.original_string << "' because that would modify " << original_ingredient_name << " which is an ingredient of recipe " << caller.name << " but not also a product\n" << end(); return; } } // check if there's any indirect modification going on set<int> current_ingredient_indices = ingredient_indices(inst, current_ingredient_and_aliases); if (current_ingredient_indices.empty()) return; // ingredient not found in call for (set<int>::iterator p = current_ingredient_indices.begin(); p != current_ingredient_indices.end(); ++p) { const int current_ingredient_index = *p; reagent current_ingredient = inst.ingredients.at(current_ingredient_index); canonize_type(current_ingredient); const string& current_ingredient_name = current_ingredient.name; if (!contains_key(Recipe, inst.operation)) { // primitive recipe // we got here only because we got an instruction with an implicit product, and the instruction didn't explicitly spell it out // put x, y:offset, z // instead of // x <- put x, y:offset, z if (inst.operation == PUT || inst.operation == PUT_INDEX) { if (current_ingredient_index == 0) { if (current_ingredient_name == original_ingredient_name) raise << maybe(caller.name) << "cannot modify '" << current_ingredient_name << "' in instruction '" << inst.original_string << "' because it's an ingredient of recipe " << caller.name << " but not also a product\n" << end(); else raise << maybe(caller.name) << "cannot modify '" << current_ingredient_name << "' in instruction '" << inst.original_string << "' because that would modify '" << original_ingredient_name << "' which is an ingredient of recipe " << caller.name << " but not also a product\n" << end(); } } } else { // defined recipe if (is_modified_in_recipe(inst.operation, current_ingredient_index, caller)) { if (current_ingredient_name == original_ingredient_name) raise << maybe(caller.name) << "cannot modify '" << current_ingredient_name << "' in instruction '" << inst.original_string << "' because it's an ingredient of recipe " << caller.name << " but not also a product\n" << end(); else raise << maybe(caller.name) << "cannot modify '" << current_ingredient_name << "' in instruction '" << inst.original_string << "' because that would modify '" << original_ingredient_name << "' which is an ingredient of recipe " << caller.name << " but not also a product\n" << end(); } } } } bool is_modified_in_recipe(const recipe_ordinal r, const int ingredient_index, const recipe& caller) { const recipe& callee = get(Recipe, r); if (!callee.has_header) { raise << maybe(caller.name) << "can't check mutability of ingredients in recipe " << callee.name << " because it uses 'next-ingredient' directly, rather than a recipe header.\n" << end(); return true; } if (ingredient_index >= SIZE(callee.ingredients)) return false; // optional immutable ingredient return is_present_in_products(callee, callee.ingredients.at(ingredient_index).name); } bool is_present_in_products(const recipe& callee, const string& ingredient_name) { for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(callee.products); ++i) { if (callee.products.at(i).name == ingredient_name) return true; } return false; } set<int> ingredient_indices(const instruction& inst, const set<reagent>& ingredient_names) { set<int> result; for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(inst.ingredients); ++i) { if (is_literal(inst.ingredients.at(i))) continue; if (ingredient_names.find(inst.ingredients.at(i)) != ingredient_names.end()) result.insert(i); } return result; } //: Sometimes you want to pass in two addresses, one pointing inside the //: other. For example, you want to delete a node from a linked list. You //: can't pass both pointers back out, because if a caller tries to make both //: identical then you can't tell which value will be written on the way out. //: //: Experimental solution: just tell Mu that one points inside the other. //: This way we can return just one pointer as high up as necessary to capture //: all modifications performed by a recipe. //: //: We'll see if we end up wanting to abuse /contained-in for other reasons. :(scenarios transform) :(scenario can_modify_contained_in_addresses) container test-list [ value:num next:&:test-list ] def main [ local-scope p:&:test-list <- new test-list:type foo p ] def foo p:&:test-list -> p:&:test-list [ local-scope load-ingredients p2:&:test-list <- test-next p p <- test-remove p2, p ] def test-next x:&:test-list -> y:&:test-list [ local-scope load-ingredients y <- get *x, next:offset ] def test-remove x:&:test-list/contained-in:from, from:&:test-list -> from:&:test-list [ local-scope load-ingredients *x <- put *x, value:offset, 34 # can modify x ] $error: 0 :(before "End Immutable Ingredients Special-cases") if (has_property(current_ingredient, "contained-in")) { const string_tree* tmp = property(current_ingredient, "contained-in"); if (!tmp->atom || (!is_present_in_ingredients(caller, tmp->value) && !is_present_in_products(caller, tmp->value))) { raise << maybe(caller.name) << "/contained-in can only point to another ingredient or product, but got '" << to_string(property(current_ingredient, "contained-in")) << "'\n" << end(); } continue; } :(scenario contained_in_check) container test-list [ value:num next:&:test-list ] def test-remove x:&:test-list/contained-in:result, from:&:test-list -> result:&:test-list [ local-scope load-ingredients result <- copy 0 ] $error: 0