1 files changed, 76 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/manifesto.html b/manifesto.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8092c74
--- /dev/null
+++ b/manifesto.html
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html dir="ltr" lang="en">
+    <head>
+        <meta charset='utf-8'>
+        <title>c9 Manifesto</title>
+    </head>
+    <body>
+
+        <a href="index.html">Documentation Index</a>
+
+        <h1>Guerilla Open Access Manifesto</h1>
+
+<pre>
+Information is power. But like all power, there are those who want to keep it for
+themselves. The world's entire scientific and cultural heritage, published over centuries
+in books and journals, is increasingly being digitized and locked up by a handful of
+private corporations. Want to read the papers featuring the most famous results of the
+sciences? You'll need to send enormous amounts to publishers like Reed Elsevier.
+
+There are those struggling to change this. The Open Access Movement has fought
+valiantly to ensure that scientists do not sign their copyrights away but instead ensure
+their work is published on the Internet, under terms that allow anyone to access it. But
+even under the best scenarios, their work will only apply to things published in the future.
+Everything up until now will have been lost.
+
+That is too high a price to pay. Forcing academics to pay money to read the work of their
+colleagues? Scanning entire libraries but only allowing the folks at Google to read them?
+Providing scientific articles to those at elite universities in the First World, but not to
+children in the Global South? It's outrageous and unacceptable.
+
+"I agree," many say, "but what can we do? The companies hold the copyrights, they
+make enormous amounts of money by charging for access, and it's perfectly legal -
+there's nothing we can do to stop them." But there is something we can, something that's
+already being done: we can fight back.
+
+Those with access to these resources - students, librarians, scientists  - you have been
+given a privilege. You get to feed at this banquet of knowledge while the rest of the world
+is locked out. But you need not - indeed, morally, you cannot keep this privilege for
+yourselves. You have a duty to share it with the world. And you have: trading passwords
+with colleagues, filling download requests for friends.
+
+
+
+Meanwhile, those who have been locked out are not standing idly by. You have been
+sneaking through holes and climbing over fences, liberating the information locked up by
+the publishers and sharing them with your friends.
+
+But all of this action goes on in the dark, hidden underground. It's called stealing or
+piracy, as if sharing a wealth of knowledge were the moral equivalent of plundering a
+ship and murdering its crew. But sharing isn't immoral - it's a moral imperative. Only
+those blinded by greed would refuse to let a friend make a copy.
+
+Large corporations, of course, are blinded by greed. The laws under which they operate
+require it - their shareholders would revolt at anything less. And the politicians they
+have bought off back them, passing laws giving them the exclusive power to decide who
+can make copies.
+
+There is no justice in following unjust laws. It's time to come into the light and, in the
+grand tradition of civil disobedience, declare our opposition to this private theft of public
+culture.
+
+We need to take information, wherever it is stored, make our copies and share them with
+the world. We need to take stuff that's out of copyright and add it to the archive. We need
+to buy secret databases and put them on the Web. We need to download scientific
+journals and upload them to file sharing networks. We need to fight for Guerilla Open
+Access.
+
+With enough of us, around the world, we'll not just send a strong message opposing the
+privatization of knowledge - we'll make it a thing of the past. Will you join us?
+
+Aaron Swartz
+
+July 2008, Eremo, Italy
+</pre>
+    </body>
+</html>