2095

Finally terminate the experiment of keeping debug prints around. I'm
also going to give up on maintaining counts.

What we really need is two kinds of tracing:
  a) For tests, just the domain-specific facts, organized by labels.
  b) For debugging, just transient dumps to stdout.
b) only works if stdout is clean by default.

Hmm, I think this means 'stash' should be the transient kind of trace.

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/052tangle.cc b/052tangle.cc
index 3392acbf..c6e9edbb 100644
--- a/052tangle.cc
+++ b/052tangle.cc
@@ -32,13 +32,11 @@ Fragments_used.clear();
 else if (command == "before") {
   string label = next_word(in);
   recipe tmp = slurp_recipe(in);
-//?   cerr << "adding before fragment " << label << '\n'; //? 1
   Before_fragments[label].steps.insert(Before_fragments[label].steps.end(), tmp.steps.begin(), tmp.steps.end());
 }
 else if (command == "after") {
   string label = next_word(in);
   recipe tmp = slurp_recipe(in);
-//?   cerr << "adding after fragment " << label << '\n'; //? 1
   After_fragments[label].steps.insert(After_fragments[label].steps.begin(), tmp.steps.begin(), tmp.steps.end());
 }
 
@@ -72,12 +70,10 @@ void insert_fragments(const recipe_ordinal r) {
       made_progress = true;
       Fragments_used.insert(inst.label);
       if (Before_fragments.find(inst.label) != Before_fragments.end()) {
-//?         cerr << "loading code before " << inst.label << '\n'; //? 1
         result.insert(result.end(), Before_fragments[inst.label].steps.begin(), Before_fragments[inst.label].steps.end());
       }
       result.push_back(inst);
       if (After_fragments.find(inst.label) != After_fragments.end()) {
-//?         cerr << "loading code after " << inst.label << '\n'; //? 1
         result.insert(result.end(), After_fragments[inst.label].steps.begin(), After_fragments[inst.label].steps.end());
       }
     }