about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/test.lua
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com>2022-05-23 08:13:58 -0700
committerKartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com>2022-05-23 08:17:40 -0700
commit37f1313b16971200f56552dbbf8c2b0b2b65417e (patch)
treee16e4ed0862a03d775a71cf4dea6d04864421d32 /test.lua
parent46d4c4de10b31a82664364364c911e1d8a08c0e5 (diff)
downloadview.love-37f1313b16971200f56552dbbf8c2b0b2b65417e.tar.gz
first successful pagedown test, first bug found by test
I also really need to rethink how people debug my programs. My approach
of inserting and deleting print() takes a lot of commitment. I need my
old trace-based whitebox testing idea. However, in my past projects I
never did figure out a good framework for tweaking how verbose a trace
to emit.

Perhaps that's too many knobs. Perhaps we just need a way to run a
single test with the most verbose trace possible. Then it's just a
matter of having the trace tell a coherent story? But even if the trace
stays out of program output in that situation, it's still in the
programmer's face in the _code_. Ugh.

Current plan: ship program with maximum tests and zero commented-out
prints. If you want to debug, insert prints. This is better than
previous, text-mode, projects just by virtue of the stdout channel being
dedicated to debug stuff.
Diffstat (limited to 'test.lua')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions