diff options
author | Kartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com> | 2022-05-23 08:13:58 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com> | 2022-05-23 08:17:40 -0700 |
commit | 37f1313b16971200f56552dbbf8c2b0b2b65417e (patch) | |
tree | e16e4ed0862a03d775a71cf4dea6d04864421d32 /test.lua | |
parent | 46d4c4de10b31a82664364364c911e1d8a08c0e5 (diff) | |
download | view.love-37f1313b16971200f56552dbbf8c2b0b2b65417e.tar.gz |
first successful pagedown test, first bug found by test
I also really need to rethink how people debug my programs. My approach of inserting and deleting print() takes a lot of commitment. I need my old trace-based whitebox testing idea. However, in my past projects I never did figure out a good framework for tweaking how verbose a trace to emit. Perhaps that's too many knobs. Perhaps we just need a way to run a single test with the most verbose trace possible. Then it's just a matter of having the trace tell a coherent story? But even if the trace stays out of program output in that situation, it's still in the programmer's face in the _code_. Ugh. Current plan: ship program with maximum tests and zero commented-out prints. If you want to debug, insert prints. This is better than previous, text-mode, projects just by virtue of the stdout channel being dedicated to debug stuff.
Diffstat (limited to 'test.lua')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions