1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
|
#!/bin/bash
# Advanced Prompt Classification System
# Multi-layer approach combining semantic analysis, pattern matching, and confidence scoring
# Get the directory where this script is located
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
source "${SCRIPT_DIR}/logging.sh"
# --- Classification Configuration ---
CLASSIFIER_MODEL="gemma3n:e2b" # Lightweight model for classification
CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD=0.7
# --- Semantic Classification ---
classify_semantic() {
local prompt="$1"
local classification_prompt="You are a prompt classifier. Analyze this prompt and determine which AI thinking mechanism would be most appropriate.
PROMPT: \"$prompt\"
AVAILABLE MECHANISMS:
- DIRECT: Simple questions, factual queries, straightforward requests
- CONSENSUS: Multiple perspectives needed, voting, agreement/disagreement
- SYNTHESIS: Combining approaches, integration, unification
- EXPLORATION: Comparing alternatives, strategic planning, option analysis
- SOCRATIC: Deep analysis, questioning assumptions, thorough investigation
- CRITIQUE: Improvement suggestions, refinement, enhancement
- PEER_REVIEW: Collaborative feedback, review processes, advice
Respond with ONLY the mechanism name and confidence (0.0-1.0):
Format: MECHANISM_NAME:CONFIDENCE
Example: EXPLORATION:0.85"
local result=$(ollama run "$CLASSIFIER_MODEL" "$classification_prompt" 2>/dev/null)
echo "$result"
}
# --- Intent Pattern Analysis ---
analyze_intent_patterns() {
local prompt="$1"
# Initialize scores using individual variables (more portable)
local direct_score=0
local consensus_score=0
local synthesis_score=0
local exploration_score=0
local socratic_score=0
local critique_score=0
local peer_review_score=0
local puzzle_score=0
# Question type patterns
if [[ "$prompt" =~ ^(what|when|where|who|which|how\ much|how\ many) ]]; then
direct_score=$((direct_score + 3))
fi
if [[ "$prompt" =~ ^(why|how|explain) ]]; then
socratic_score=$((socratic_score + 2))
fi
# Action-oriented patterns
if [[ "$prompt" =~ (compare|contrast|evaluate|assess) ]]; then
exploration_score=$((exploration_score + 3))
fi
if [[ "$prompt" =~ (improve|enhance|fix|refine|optimize|better) ]]; then
critique_score=$((critique_score + 3))
fi
if [[ "$prompt" =~ (combine|merge|integrate|synthesize|unify) ]]; then
synthesis_score=$((synthesis_score + 3))
fi
if [[ "$prompt" =~ (review|feedback|opinion|thoughts|suggest) ]]; then
peer_review_score=$((peer_review_score + 2))
fi
if [[ "$prompt" =~ (consensus|vote|agree|disagree|multiple.*view) ]]; then
consensus_score=$((consensus_score + 3))
fi
# Context patterns
if [[ "$prompt" =~ (strategy|strategic|plan|approach|option|alternative) ]]; then
exploration_score=$((exploration_score + 2))
fi
if [[ "$prompt" =~ (analyze|analysis|examine|investigate|deep|thorough) ]]; then
socratic_score=$((socratic_score + 2))
fi
# Puzzle and coding patterns
if [[ "$prompt" =~ (puzzle|solve|algorithm|code|programming|implement|sort|search|optimize|data.*structure) ]]; then
puzzle_score=$((puzzle_score + 3))
fi
if [[ "$prompt" =~ (challenge|problem|question|task|assignment|exercise) ]]; then
puzzle_score=$((puzzle_score + 2))
fi
# Lil-specific patterns - highest priority for puzzle mechanism
if [[ "$prompt" =~ (lil|LIL|using lil|in lil|with lil|lil programming|lil language|lil script) ]]; then
puzzle_score=$((puzzle_score + 5)) # Higher score than other patterns
fi
# Find highest scoring mechanism
local max_score=0
local best_mechanism="DIRECT"
if [ "$direct_score" -gt "$max_score" ]; then
max_score="$direct_score"
best_mechanism="DIRECT"
fi
if [ "$consensus_score" -gt "$max_score" ]; then
max_score="$consensus_score"
best_mechanism="CONSENSUS"
fi
if [ "$synthesis_score" -gt "$max_score" ]; then
max_score="$synthesis_score"
best_mechanism="SYNTHESIS"
fi
if [ "$exploration_score" -gt "$max_score" ]; then
max_score="$exploration_score"
best_mechanism="EXPLORATION"
fi
if [ "$socratic_score" -gt "$max_score" ]; then
max_score="$socratic_score"
best_mechanism="SOCRATIC"
fi
if [ "$critique_score" -gt "$max_score" ]; then
max_score="$critique_score"
best_mechanism="CRITIQUE"
fi
if [ "$peer_review_score" -gt "$max_score" ]; then
max_score="$peer_review_score"
best_mechanism="PEER_REVIEW"
fi
if [ "$puzzle_score" -gt "$max_score" ]; then
max_score="$puzzle_score"
best_mechanism="PUZZLE"
fi
# Calculate confidence based on score distribution
local total_score=$((direct_score + consensus_score + synthesis_score + exploration_score + socratic_score + critique_score + peer_review_score + puzzle_score))
local confidence="0.0"
if [ "$total_score" -gt 0 ]; then
confidence=$(echo "scale=2; $max_score / $total_score" | bc -l 2>/dev/null || echo "0.5")
fi
echo "$best_mechanism:$confidence"
}
# --- Complexity Analysis ---
analyze_complexity() {
local prompt="$1"
local word_count=$(echo "$prompt" | wc -w)
local sentence_count=$(echo "$prompt" | tr '.' '\n' | wc -l)
local question_count=$(echo "$prompt" | grep -o '?' | wc -l)
# Simple heuristics for complexity
local complexity_score=0
# Word count factor
if [ "$word_count" -gt 50 ]; then
complexity_score=$((complexity_score + 3))
elif [ "$word_count" -gt 20 ]; then
complexity_score=$((complexity_score + 2))
elif [ "$word_count" -le 5 ]; then
complexity_score=$((complexity_score - 2))
fi
# Multiple questions suggest complexity
if [ "$question_count" -gt 1 ]; then
complexity_score=$((complexity_score + 2))
fi
# Multiple sentences suggest complexity
if [ "$sentence_count" -gt 3 ]; then
complexity_score=$((complexity_score + 1))
fi
echo "$complexity_score"
}
# --- Confidence Weighted Classification ---
classify_prompt() {
local prompt="$1"
local use_semantic="${2:-true}"
echo "=== Advanced Prompt Classification ===" >&2
echo "Analyzing: \"$prompt\"" >&2
echo >&2
# Get pattern-based classification
local pattern_result=$(analyze_intent_patterns "$prompt")
local pattern_mechanism=$(echo "$pattern_result" | cut -d':' -f1)
local pattern_confidence=$(echo "$pattern_result" | cut -d':' -f2)
echo "Pattern Analysis: $pattern_mechanism (confidence: $pattern_confidence)" >&2
# Get complexity score
local complexity=$(analyze_complexity "$prompt")
echo "Complexity Score: $complexity" >&2
# Apply complexity adjustments
if [ "$complexity" -lt 0 ] && [ "$pattern_mechanism" != "DIRECT" ]; then
echo "Low complexity detected - suggesting DIRECT" >&2
pattern_mechanism="DIRECT"
pattern_confidence="0.8"
elif [ "$complexity" -gt 4 ]; then
echo "High complexity detected - boosting complex mechanisms" >&2
case "$pattern_mechanism" in
"DIRECT")
pattern_mechanism="SOCRATIC"
pattern_confidence="0.7"
;;
esac
fi
local final_mechanism="$pattern_mechanism"
local final_confidence="$pattern_confidence"
# Use semantic classification if available and requested
if [ "$use_semantic" = "true" ] && command -v ollama >/dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "Running semantic analysis..." >&2
local semantic_result=$(classify_semantic "$prompt")
# Clean up the result
semantic_result=$(echo "$semantic_result" | tr -d ' ' | head -n1)
if [[ "$semantic_result" =~ ^[A-Z_]+:[0-9.]+$ ]]; then
local semantic_mechanism=$(echo "$semantic_result" | cut -d':' -f1)
local semantic_confidence=$(echo "$semantic_result" | cut -d':' -f2)
echo "Semantic Analysis: $semantic_mechanism (confidence: $semantic_confidence)" >&2
# Weighted combination of pattern and semantic results
local pattern_weight=$(echo "$pattern_confidence * 0.6" | bc -l 2>/dev/null || echo "0.3")
local semantic_weight=$(echo "$semantic_confidence * 0.4" | bc -l 2>/dev/null || echo "0.2")
# If both agree, boost confidence
if [ "$pattern_mechanism" = "$semantic_mechanism" ]; then
final_confidence=$(echo "$pattern_confidence + 0.2" | bc -l 2>/dev/null || echo "0.8")
if (( $(echo "$final_confidence > 1.0" | bc -l 2>/dev/null || echo "0") )); then
final_confidence="1.0"
fi
echo "Pattern and semantic agree - boosting confidence to $final_confidence" >&2
# If semantic has higher confidence, use it
elif (( $(echo "$semantic_confidence > $pattern_confidence + 0.1" | bc -l 2>/dev/null || echo "0") )); then
final_mechanism="$semantic_mechanism"
final_confidence="$semantic_confidence"
echo "Using semantic result due to higher confidence" >&2
fi
else
log_warning "Semantic classification failed or returned invalid format: $semantic_result"
fi
fi
# Final confidence check
if (( $(echo "$final_confidence < $CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD" | bc -l 2>/dev/null || echo "0") )); then
echo "Low confidence ($final_confidence < $CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD) - defaulting to DIRECT" >&2
final_mechanism="DIRECT"
final_confidence="0.5"
fi
echo >&2
echo "=== Final Classification ===" >&2
echo "Mechanism: $final_mechanism" >&2
echo "Confidence: $final_confidence" >&2
echo "============================" >&2
echo "$final_mechanism:$final_confidence"
}
# --- Export Functions ---
export -f classify_prompt
export -f analyze_intent_patterns
export -f analyze_complexity
export -f classify_semantic
|