1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
|
CS61A Week 11 solutions
LAB:
----
4.27 Lazy vs. mutation
The first time you type COUNT you get 1; the second time you get 2.
Why? When you say
(define w (id (id 10)))
the DEFINE special form handler eval-definition EVALs its second
argument (id (id 10)). Given an application, EVAL calls APPLY
to invoke ID for the outer invocation, but the inner invocation
is providing an argument to a compound procedure, so it's delayed.
That's why COUNT is 1 -- the outer call to ID has actually happened,
but not the inner one.
The value of W is therefore a promise to compute (id 10), since
ID returns its argument. When you ask the evaluator to print W,
that promise is fulfilled, and so COUNT becomes 2.
4.29 Memoizing or not
You'd expect a program that uses the same argument repeatedly to
be most strongly affected. For example, I wrote
(define (n-copies n stuff)
(if (= n 0)
'()
(cons stuff (n-copies (- n 1) stuff))))
Then if you use n-copies with something requiring a fair amount
of computation, such as
(n-copies 6 (factorial 7))
you can see a dramatic difference.
About their square/id example, remember to (set! count 0) before
each experiment. Then the memoizing version leaves count at 1,
whereas the non-memoizing version sets count to 2.
4.35 an-integer-between
(define (an-integer-between low high)
(if (> low high)
(amb)
(amb low (an-integer-between (+ low 1) high))))
4.38 adjacent floors
Remove the line (require (not (= (abs (- smith fletcher)) 1)))
[The continuation part of the lab was just try-this.]
HOMEWORK:
---------
4.25 UNLESS in normal vs. applicative order
In ordinary (applicative order) Scheme, this version of FACTORIAL
will be an infinite loop, because the argument subexpression
(* n (factorial (- n 1))) is evaluated before UNLESS is called,
whether or not n is 1.
In normal order Scheme it'll work fine, because the argument
subexpressions aren't evaluated until they're needed. What
will actually happen is that each use of the special form IF
within UNLESS will force the computation of (= n 1), but
no multiplications will happen until the evaluator tries to
print the result. In effect, (factorial 5) returns the thunk
(lambda () (* 5 (* 4 (* 3 (* 2 (* 1 1))))))
and that gets evaluated just in time to print the answer.
4.26 Normal order vs. special forms
For Ben's side of the argument we must implement UNLESS as a
derived expression:
(define (unless->if exp)
(make-if (unless-predicate exp)
(unless-consequent exp)
(unless-alternative exp)))
(define unless-predicate cadr)
(define unless-alternative caddr)
(define unless-consequent cadddr)
Notice that we reversed the order of the last two subexpressions in
the call to make-if.
Then we just add a clause
((unless? exp) (eval (unless->if exp) env))
to the ordinary metacircular evaluator, or
((unless? exp) (analyze (unless->if exp)))
to the analyzing evaluator.
For Alyssa's side of the argument, we need a case in which it's useful to
have a Scheme special form available as an ordinary procedure. The only
thing we can do with ordinary procedures but not with special forms is use
them as arguments to higher-order procedures. An example using UNLESS will
be a little strained, so first we'll look at a more common situation
involving a different special form, namely AND. We'd like to be able to say
(define (all-true? tf-list)
(accumulate and tf-list))
Now, here's the strained example using UNLESS: Suppose we have a list of
true-false values and we'd like to add up the number of true ones. Here's a
somewhat strange way to do it:
(define zero-list (cons 0 '()))
(set-cdr! zero-list zero-list)
(define one-list (cons 1 '()))
(set-cdr! one-list one-list)
(define (howmany-true tf-list)
(apply + (map unless tf-list zero-list one-list)))
Zero-list is an infinite list of zeros; one-list is an infinite list
of ones. We make use of the fact that MAP's end test is that its
first argument is empty, so MAP will return a list the same size as
the argument tf-list. For example, if tf-list is
(#t #t #f #t)
then map will return
(1 1 0 1)
created, in effect, this way:
(list (unless #t 0 1)
(unless #t 0 1)
(unless #f 0 1)
(unless #t 0 1))
And so + will return 3, the number of trues in the list.
4.28 Why force the operator of a combination?
Thunks are made by APPLY, representing arguments to defined procedures.
So we need a case in which the operator of an expression is the returned
argument of a defined procedure. Here's an example:
(((lambda (a b) a) + -) 2 3)
4.30 Side effects vs. lazy evaluation
(a) Why is Ben right about for-each?
For-each includes the expression (proc (car items)). As we
discussed in ex. 4.28, the lazy evaluator will force the
operator of that expression, i.e., PROC. The resulting
procedure has two invocations of primitives, NEWLINE and
DISPLAY. Evaluating those invocations will actually call
the procedures, and the argument X to DISPLAY will be
evaluated because DISPLAY is primitive.
(b) What happens in Cy's example?
First of all, in ordinary Scheme both (p1 1) and (p2 1) give
the result (1 2).
With the book's version of eval-sequence, (p1 1) is still (1 2)
but (p2 1) is 1, because the SET! will never happen. The
subprocedure P has a two-expression sequence as its body, and
the first expression will never be evaluated.
With Cy's version both (p1 1) and (p2 1) are (1 2), as in
ordinary Scheme.
(c) Why doesn't Cy's version change part (a)?
The change isn't as dramatic as it may seem. Don't think that
the original eval-sequence calls delay-it! It calls EVAL, and
most of the time EVAL does return a value, not a thunk. In
particular, a procedure call is carried out right away; it's
only the *arguments* to the procedure that are delayed. That's
why Cy had to use a weird example in which a SET! expression
is used as an argument to a procedure in order to get the wrong
result.
(d) What's the right thing to do?
The combination of lazy evaluation and mutation in the same language
is so confusing that programmers would be surprised no matter which
choice we made. That's why, in the real world, the languages that
use normal order evaluation are *functional* languages in which
there is no mutation or other side effects. In such a language,
there are no sequences (if there are no side effects, what would
be the point?) and the problem doesn't arise.
But if we really wanted to have a normal-order Scheme, we'd
probably want to change the semantics of the language as little
as possible -- programs that work in ordinary Scheme should work
in lazy Scheme too. So I think Cy is right.
4.32 Lazy trees
One possibility is to use doubly-lazy lists as an alternative to
interleaving, when dealing with a naturally two-dimensional problem.
For example, to get pairs of integers, we could say
(define (pairs a b)
(cons (map (lambda (x) (cons (car a) x)) b)
(pairs (cdr a) b)))
Then we could use this data structure with two-dimensional versions
of the usual higher order procedures. For example:
(define (2dfilter pred s)
(if (null? s)
'()
(cons (filter pred (car s))
(2dfilter pred (cdr s)))))
4.33 Quoted lazy lists
Instead of
((quoted? exp) (text-of-quotation exp))
we need a more complicated treatment to turn the ordinary lists
of the underlying Scheme into lazy lists.
((quoted? exp) (process-quotation (text-of-quotation exp) env))
(define (process-quotation quoted env)
(if (pair? quoted)
(lazy-cons (process-quotation (car quoted) env)
(process-quotation (cdr quoted) env)
env)
quoted))
(define (lazy-cons x y env)
(make-procedure '(m) (list (list 'm x y)) env))
or alternatively
(define (lazy-cons x y env)
(apply (lookup-variable-value 'cons env)
(list x y)))
This lazy-cons is the below-the-line equivalent of the above-the-line
CONS on page 409.
4.36 all Pythagorean triples
Replacing an-integer-between with an-integer-starting-from won't
work because the AMB that provides the value for K will never fail,
and so I and J will always be 1 forever.
To make this work, we note that K must always be larger than I or J,
so I and J can be restricted to finite ranges if we choose a value
for K first:
(define (a-pythgorean-triple)
(let ((k (an-integer-starting-from 1)))
(let ((i (an-integer-between 1 (- k 1))))
(let ((j (an-integer-between i (- k 1))))
(require (= (+ (* i i) (* j j)) (* k k)))
(list i j k)))))
4.42 liars
(define (liars)
(define (onetrue? x y)
(if x (if y #f #t) y))
(let ((betty (amb 1 2 3 4 5))
(ethel (amb 1 2 3 4 5))
(joan (amb 1 2 3 4 5))
(kitty (amb 1 2 3 4 5))
(mary (amb 1 2 3 4 5)))
(require (distinct? (list betty ethel joan kitty mary)))
(require (onetrue? (= kitty 2) (= betty 3)))
(require (onetrue? (= ethel 1) (= joan 2)))
(require (onetrue? (= joan 3) (= ethel 5)))
(require (onetrue? (= kitty 2) (= mary 4)))
(require (onetrue? (= mary 4) (= betty 1)))
(list (list 'betty betty) (list 'ethel ethel) (list 'joan joan)
(list 'kitty kitty) (list 'mary mary))))
As in the multiple dwelling puzzle, this program can be made much more
efficient by checking for distinct values as we go along instead of
after all values have been assigned:
(let ((betty (amb 1 2 3 4 5))
(ethel (amb 1 2 3 4 5)))
(require (distinct? (list betty ethel)))
(let ((joan (amb 1 2 3 4 5)))
(require (distinct? (list betty ethel joan)))
...
4.45 ambiguous sentence
(sentence
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(verb-phrase
(verb lectures)
(prep-phrase (prep to)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))
(prep-phrase (prep in)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun class))
(prep-phrase (prep with)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun cat)))))))))
This version means that a cat is a student in the class, and the professor
lectures to another student in the class.
(sentence
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(verb-phrase
(verb lectures)
(prep-phrase (prep to)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))
(prep-phrase (prep in)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun class))))
(prep-phrase (prep with)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun cat)))))))
This version means that the professor lectures to a student, and that that
student is in the class and has a cat, which may or may not be present.
(sentence
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(verb-phrase
(verb-phrase
(verb lectures)
(prep-phrase (prep to)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))
(prep-phrase (prep in)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun class))))))
(prep-phrase (prep with)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun cat)))))
This version means that the professor brings a cat along while lecturing
to the student who is in the class.
(sentence
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(verb-phrase
(verb-phrase
(verb-phrase
(verb lectures)
(prep-phrase (prep to)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student)))))
(prep-phrase (prep in)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun class))))
(prep-phrase (prep with)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun cat)))))
This version means that the professor does the lecturing in the class,
bringing a cat along, to some student about whom we know nothing.
(sentence
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(verb-phrase
(verb-phrase
(verb lectures)
(prep-phrase (prep to)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student)))))
(prep-phrase (prep in)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun class))
(prep-phrase (prep with)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun cat)))))))
This version means that the professor does the lecturing in a class
that includes a cat as a member, to a student about whom we know nothing.
4.47 left-recursive grammar
As Louis' programs go, this one is pretty successful! It does generate
the two correct parsings for "The professor lectures to the student
with the cat," in the opposite order from what's shown in the book.
But if you say try-again again, instead of reporting that there are
no more values, the parser gets in an infinite loop.
What happens is this: (parse-word verbs) fails, so parse-verb-phrase
is called recursively. In that recursive call, (parse-word verbs) fails,
so parse-verb-phrase is called recursively. In that recursive call...
and so on.
Interchanging the order of expressions in the AMB just makes things
worse; this infinite recursion happens the *first* time, so you don't
even see the correct parsings before it loops.
4.48 grammar extensions
For compound sentences, first rename parse-sentence as parse-simple-sentence:
(define (parse-simple-sentence)
(list 'simple-sentence
(parse-noun-phrase)
(parse-verb-phrase)))
(define (parse-sentence)
(define (maybe-extend sentence)
(amb sentence
(maybe-extend (list 'sentence
sentence
(parse-word connectors)
(parse-simple-sentence)))))
(maybe-extend (parse-simple-sentence)))
(define connectors '(connector and or but))
For adjectives, we have to provide for the possibility of them
between the article and the noun:
(define (parse-simple-noun-phrase)
(cons 'simple-noun-phrase
(append (list (parse-word articles))
(maybe-some adjectives)
(list (parse-word nouns)))))
(define adjectives '(adjective big tiny silly robust enthusiastic))
(define (maybe-some words)
(amb (cons (parse-word words)
(maybe-some words))
'()))
Note that unlike most of the parsing procedures, maybe-some doesn't fail if
it can't find what it wants. If it can't find any adjectives it just
returns an empty list. That's why parse-simple-noun-phrase has to use
append, to avoid seeing
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) () (noun cat))
Adverbs are similar except that they go into parse-verb-phrase.
4.49 generating sentences
(define (parse-word word-list)
(define (iter words)
(if (null? words)
(amb)
(amb (car words) (iter (cdr words)))))
(list (car word-list) (iter (cdr word-list))))
Here are the first several sentences it creates:
(sentence (noun-phrase (article the) (noun student)) (verb studies))
(sentence (noun-phrase (article the) (noun student)) (verb lectures))
(sentence (noun-phrase (article the) (noun student)) (verb eats))
(sentence (noun-phrase (article the) (noun student)) (verb sleeps))
(sentence (noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor)) (verb studies))
(sentence (noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor)) (verb lectures))
(sentence (noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor)) (verb eats))
(sentence (noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor)) (verb sleeps))
(sentence (noun-phrase (article the) (noun cat)) (verb studies))
4.50 random choice
We must write ANALYZE-RAMB, a variant on the ANALYZE-AMB of p. 434:
(define (analyze-ramb exp)
(let ((cprocs (map analyze (amb-choices exp))))
(lambda (env succeed fail)
(define (try-next choices)
(if (null? choices)
(fail)
(let ((random-order (rotate choices (random (length choices)))))
((car random-order) env
succeed
(lambda ()
(try-next (cdr random-order)))))))
(try-next cprocs))))
(define (rotate seq num)
(if (= num 0)
seq
(rotate (append (cdr seq) (list (car seq)))
(- num 1)))
Then we must add a clause to ANALYZE to check for and handle RAMB,
similar to the one for AMB.
It's not actually so easy to use RAMB to get good sentences. The problem
is that we really don't want a more complicated choice to be just as likely
as a simple choice, or our sentences will be too long. If we change
every AMB in the parser to RAMB, I get these results:
[Note: The second one is really long! I suggest reading this in emacs
and using control-meta-F to skip over it.]
(sentence
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase (prep with)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun cat))
(prep-phrase (prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))))))
(verb studies))
(sentence
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase (prep with)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun cat))
(prep-phrase (prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a)
(noun student))))))
(verb-phrase
(verb-phrase
(verb studies)
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep by)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun class))
(prep-phrase
(prep with)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun class))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep with)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun class))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a)
(noun student))))))))))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))))
(prep-phrase
(prep with)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun cat))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep with)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun student))))
(prep-phrase
(prep with)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a)
(noun professor))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep with)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun class))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun student))))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep with)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun class))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun class))))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))))
(prep-phrase
(prep with)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun class))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun class))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(simple-noun-phrase
(article a)
(noun class))))))))))))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun cat))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun class))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun class))
(prep-phrase
(prep by)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep with)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun class))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun cat))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun class))
(prep-phrase
(prep with)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep with)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a)
(noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun student))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a)
(noun class))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun class))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun class))))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a)
(noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a)
(noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase
(article the)
(noun student))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep by)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a)
(noun class))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase
(article the)
(noun student))))))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep with)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep by)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a)
(noun student))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun class))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(simple-noun-phrase
(article the)
(noun professor))))))))))))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun class))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun student))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep by)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a)
(noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a)
(noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase
(article a)
(noun professor))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a)
(noun cat))))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a)
(noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun student))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun cat))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the)
(noun professor))))
(prep-phrase
(prep by)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a)
(noun professor))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun cat))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep with)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun cat))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun cat))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun class))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))))))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep with)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun class))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))))))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep to)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun cat))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(noun-phrase
(noun-phrase
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun student))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article the) (noun professor))))
(prep-phrase
(prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student))))))
(prep-phrase
(prep in)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student)))))))
We can improve on this by making the addition of a prepositional
phrase less likely. For example, we could rewrite PARSE-NOUN-PHRASE
and PARSE-VERB-PHRASE this way:
(define (parse-noun-phrase)
(define (maybe-extend noun-phrase)
(ramb noun-phrase
noun-phrase
noun-phrase
noun-phrase
noun-phrase
(maybe-extend (list 'noun-phrase
noun-phrase
(parse-prepositional-phrase)))))
(maybe-extend (parse-simple-noun-phrase)))
(define (parse-verb-phrase)
(define (maybe-extend verb-phrase)
(ramb verb-phrase
verb-phrase
verb-phrase
verb-phrase
verb-phrase
(maybe-extend (list 'verb-phrase
verb-phrase
(parse-prepositional-phrase)))))
(maybe-extend (parse-word verbs)))
With these changes, here are the first few sentences I get:
(sentence (simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor)) (verb sleeps))
(sentence (simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor)) (verb sleeps))
(sentence (simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor))
(verb-phrase
(verb sleeps)
(prep-phrase (prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student)))))
(sentence
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun professor))
(verb-phrase (verb sleeps)
(prep-phrase (prep for)
(simple-noun-phrase (article a) (noun student)))))
This is still not quite what we want, but with more fine tuning we can
probably get to a reasonable sentence generator.
4.52 if-fail
To add a new special form we add a clause to ANALYZE, which should call
this new procedure:
(define (analyze-if-fail exp)
(let ((trial (analyze (if-fail-trial exp)))
(failure (analyze (if-fail-failure exp))))
(lambda (env succeed fail)
(trial env
succeed
(lambda () (failure env succeed fail))))))
(define if-fail-trial cadr)
(define if-fail-failure caddr)
Here's a version to go with vambeval, the ambeval without analysis:
(define (eval-if-fail exp env succeed fail)
(vambeval (if-fail-trial exp)
env
succeed
(lambda () (vambeval (if-fail-failure exp)
env
succeed
fail))))
Extra for Experts
=================
4.31
Despite what the exercise says, there's no need to change the procedures that
determine the DEFINE syntax, because it doesn't check that the formal
parameters are symbols. Even MAKE-PROCEDURE doesn't check.
The hard part is in procedure invocation. The original metacircular evaluator
has this in the big COND in EVAL:
((application? exp)
(mc-apply (MC-EVAL (operator exp) env)
(LIST-OF-VALUES (operands exp) env)))
The lazy evaluator in the book changes that to
((application? exp)
(mc-apply (ACTUAL-VALUE (operator exp) env)
(operands exp) ; no LIST-OF-VALUES
ENV)) ; added argument
(For this exercise, it's easier to work with the book's version than with
the slightly different alternative shown in the lecture notes.)
So now we're giving APPLY expressions rather than values, and we're also
giving APPLY an environment in which to evaluate or thunkify the values.
We don't have to make any change to the book's EVAL; the hard part is in
APPLY, in which we have to decide whether to evaluate or thunkify.
Here's the book's lazy APPLY:
(define (mc-apply procedure arguments env)
(cond ((primitive-procedure? procedure)
(apply-primitive-procedure
procedure
(LIST-OF-ARG-VALUES ARGUMENTS ENV))) ; ***
((compound-procedure? procedure)
(eval-sequence
(procedure-body procedure)
(extend-environment
(procedure-parameters procedure)
(LIST-OF-DELAYED-ARGS ARGUMENTS ENV) ; ***
(procedure-environment procedure))))
(else
(error
"Unknown procedure type -- APPLY" procedure))))
The two commented lines handle evaluation, for primitive procedures, and
thunking, for non-primitive procedures. It's the latter we have to change;
the args may be evaluated, thunked with memoization, or thunked without
memoization. To make this decision, we have to look at the formal parameters
of the procedure we're calling. So the second commented line above will
change to
(PROCESS-ARGS arguments (PROCEDURE-PARAMETERS PROCEDURE) env)
Two things have changed; we're calling a not-yet-written procedure
PROCESS-ARGS instead of LIST-OF-DELAYED-ARGS, and we're giving that procedure
the formal parameters as well as the actual argument expressions.
One more thing has to change in APPLY: Since the list returned by
PROCEDURE-PARAMETERS is no longer a list of symbols, but can now include
sublists such as (B LAZY), we have to extract the real formal parameter
names from it. So the final version of APPLY is this:
(define (mc-apply procedure arguments env)
(cond ((primitive-procedure? procedure)
(apply-primitive-procedure
procedure
(list-of-arg-values arguments env)))
((compound-procedure? procedure)
(eval-sequence
(procedure-body procedure)
(extend-environment
(EXTRACT-NAMES (procedure-parameters procedure)) ; ***
(PROCESS-ARGS arguments (PROCEDURE-PARAMETERS PROCEDURE) env) ; ***
(procedure-environment procedure))))
(else
(error
"Unknown procedure type -- APPLY" procedure))))
Now comes the actual work, in EXTRACT-NAMES and in PROCESS-ARGS.
EXTRACT-NAMES takes as its argument a list such as
(A (B LAZY) C (D LAZY-MEMO))
and returns a list with just the variable names:
(A B C D)
(define (extract-names formals)
(cond ((null? formals) '())
((pair? (car formals)) ; CAR is (VAR TYPE), so keep CAAR in result
(cons (caar formals) (extract-names (cdr formals))))
(else (cons (car formals) (extract-names (cdr formals))))))
PROCESS-ARGS takes an argument list, let's say
((+ 2 3) (- 4 5) (* 6 7) (/ 8 9))
and a parameter list, such as
(A (B LAZY) C (D LAZY-MEMO))
and matches them up. It pays no attention to the variable names in the
parameter list; it's only looking for LAZY or LAZY-MEMO type tags. It returns
a list of argument values-and-thunks:
(5 (THUNK-NOMEMO (- 4 5) <env>) 42 (THUNK-MEMO (/ 8 9) <env>))
where <env> represents an actual environment, not the word ENV. The argument
expressions (+ 2 3) and (* 6 7) correspond to non-lazy parameters A and C,
so they've been evaluated; the other arguments have been turned into thunks
by combining them with a type-tag (THUNK-NOMEMO or THUNK-MEMO as appropriate)
and an environment. Instead of the book's DELAY-IT procedure we have to use
two different procedures, DELAY-NOMEMO and DELAY-MEMO, to construct the thunks.
(define (process-args args formals env)
(cond ((null? args) '())
((null? formals)
(error "Too many arguments"))
((pair? (car formals))
(cond ((eq? (cadar formals) 'lazy)
(cons (delay-nomemo (car args) env)
(process-args (cdr args) (cdr formals) env)))
((eq? (cadar formals) 'lazy-memo)
(cons (delay-memo (car args) env)
(process-args (cdr args) (cdr formals) env)))
(else (error "Unrecognized parameter type" (cadar formals)))))
(else (cons (EVAL (car args))
(process-args (cdr args) (cdr formals) env)))))
Note the call to EVAL in capital letters two lines up. Should that be EVAL
or ACTUAL-VALUE? The issue is what behavior we want when a procedure with a
non-lazy parameter is called with a thunk (created by calling some other
non-primitive procedure) as the argument:
(define (foo x)
x)
(define (baz (lazy x))
x)
(define p (foo (baz (/ 1 0))))
What should happen? FOO's argument is non-lazy, so we evaluate the argument
expression (BAZ (/ 1 0)). BAZ's argument is lazy, so we make a thunk that
promises to compute (/ 1 0) later, and that becomes the argument to FOO.
If we use EVAL up there, as written, then FOO will get a thunk as its
argument, and will return the thunk, which will become the value of P. If
we make it ACTUAL-VALUE, then the thunk will be forced, and we'll get an
error dividing by zero, and P won't get a value.
I think the procedure FOO probably doesn't care whether or not its argument is
a thunk, and therefore the argument shouldn't be forced. If the return value
from FOO is used in some context where a real value is needed (for example,
if we said
(foo (baz (/ 1 0)))
at the Scheme prompt instead of inside a DEFINE, then the value will be
forced.) But you'd like to be able to write something like
(define (cadr seq) (car (cdr seq)))
and if this is applied to a list of thunks, the result should be a
thunk, not the value promised by the thunk.
Perhaps there should be a third parameter type tag, so you could say
(define (f a (b lazy) c (d lazy-memo) (e forced))
...)
allowing the user to choose between EVAL and ACTUAL-VALUE here. This would
add a COND clause in APPLY:
((eq? (cadar formals) 'forced)
(cons (actual-value (car args) env)
(process-args (cdr args) (cdr formals) env)))
Now we have to do a little data abstraction:
(define (delay-nomemo exp env)
(list 'THUNK-NOMEMO exp env))
(define (delay-memo exp env)
(list 'THUNK-MEMO exp env))
Note that the thunk constructors don't have to do any real memoization or
non-memoization work; they just construct thunks that "know" which kind they
are. It's when the thunks are forced that we have to take the difference
into account:
(define (force-it obj)
(cond ((THUNK-MEMO? obj) ; two kinds of thunk testers
(let ((result (actual-value
(thunk-exp obj)
(thunk-env obj))))
(set-car! obj 'evaluated-thunk)
(set-car! (cdr obj) result) ; replace exp with its value
(set-cdr! (cdr obj) '()) ; for memoized thunk
result))
((THUNK-NOMEMO? OBJ) ; nomemo thunk is EVALed each time it's forced
(ACTUAL-VALUE (THUNK-EXP OBJ) (THUNK-ENV OBJ)))
((evaluated-thunk? obj)
(thunk-value obj))
(else obj)))
(define (thunk-memo? exp)
(tagged-list? exp 'thunk-memo))
(define (thunk-nomemo? exp)
(tagged-list exp 'thunk-nomemo))
Note that for both kinds of thunks we call ACTUAL-VALUE to cash in the promise;
the difference is that for a memoized thunk we remember the result, whereas for
a non-memoized thunk we don't.
Handle-infix: See proj4b solutions.
|