diff options
| author | Andrew Yu <andrew@andrewyu.org> | 2022-01-27 22:12:40 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrew Yu <andrew@andrewyu.org> | 2022-01-27 22:12:40 +0800 |
| commit | 2d6cfa2f2935014fb650e777b90e4dcb21c29f44 (patch) | |
| tree | 97eb3208f55bf351cdcb1e9cc06c61b9a4c3e928 | |
| parent | a0dd4aa0610cd9922fc2243f2c91f6220f592742 (diff) | |
| download | www-2d6cfa2f2935014fb650e777b90e4dcb21c29f44.tar.gz | |
ed snowden
| -rw-r--r-- | index.html | 3 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index 6415b1d..014bb78 100644 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ <h3>What about a mathematical political system?</h3> <p>A government too strong causes authoritarianism which may lead to non-democracies, while a government too weak causes the inability of the government to do anything with the slightest controversy (look at COVID handling). Is there a mathematical way (say a function; this sounds like group theory, but I'm not sure) to compute, based all known information known about the bill/order/whatever being considered, if the government (I'm especially talking about the executive here) has the right to order that? I feel like this could be proved impossible due to incompleteness and unpredictability, but this needs further investigation. This is the main problem in question of the Libre Society project, by the way.</p> </div> + <div id="quotes"> + <blockquote>Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different from saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say. —Edward Snowden</blockquote> + </div> <div id="me"> <h2>About me</h2> <p>I am Andrew Yu, a secondary school student in Shanghai, China. My main fields of interest are philosophy (especially moral philosophy, and especially especially moral philosophy in technology), metamathematics, programming fundamentals and molecular biology. I'm also a free software activist.</p> |