fine, emdash

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
index 4affd4e..7140f01 100644
--- a/index.html
+++ b/index.html
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 			<div id="ponder">
 				<h2>Help me ponder upon these questions</h2>
 				<h3>Help me choose licenses</h3>
-				<p>I am currently unable to decide what license should I choose for my programs and other works.  I used to use the GNU General Public License.  Then I realized that (1) the GPL causes compatibility problems with those who wish to use another [free] license (who do exist) and (2) the GPL restricts on what a user can do with a work.  I'm thinking of what freedom actually means---there are freedoms to do things and freedoms from being the object of some other person doing something.  Does software which you can't distribute in any form you wish count as free software?  I think so.  However, as <a href="https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html">https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html</a> explains, the GPL is based on coercing people into sharing, but coercion not effective in any field to make people actually share.  This is understandable.  I might start using the GPL again for my programs (might even be the AGPL).  However, you might wanna convince me (if you have good arguments on this) to use a license for my documents and books---I put them into the public domain, and I think that's okay.  Please mail me if you have any thoughts on this.  But sad examples:  Minix was permissively licensed, got abused by Intel.  The BSD stuff was permissively licensed, got abused by Apple.</p>
+				<p>I am currently unable to decide what license should I choose for my programs and other works.  I used to use the GNU General Public License.  Then I realized that (1) the GPL causes compatibility problems with those who wish to use another [free] license (who do exist) and (2) the GPL restricts on what a user can do with a work.  I'm thinking of what freedom actually means---&emdash;there are freedoms to do things and freedoms from being the object of some other person doing something.  Does software which you can't distribute in any form you wish count as free software?  I think so.  However, as <a href="https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html">https://unixsheikh.com/articles/the-problems-with-the-gpl.html</a> explains, the GPL is based on coercing people into sharing, but coercion not effective in any field to make people actually share.  This is understandable.  I might start using the GPL again for my programs (might even be the AGPL).  However, you might wanna convince me (if you have good arguments on this) to use a license for my documents and books---&emdash;I put them into the public domain, and I think that's okay.  Please mail me if you have any thoughts on this.  But sad examples:  Minix was permissively licensed, got abused by Intel.  The BSD stuff was permissively licensed, got abused by Apple.</p>
 				<h3>What about a pure functional Lisp dialect, with monads and similar ideas?</h3>
 				<p>I love s-expressions, as they clearly represent the structure of a program, or even natural language.  They also allow for powerful macros, enabling some Lisp dialects to have continuations and other cool stuff.  Haskell, on the other hand, is purely functional, where things that involve side effects are usually implemented with Monads.  I'm looking for an implementation that combines these.</p>
 				<h3>What about a mathematical political system?</h3>
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
 			<p>This site is designed to be viewable with plain text, only a few typographic and web design conventions are followed. Do you agree that max-width: 75ex makes sense?  I do that since people have a hard time scanning scross lines.  Also, I use a monospace font because that's what I'm used to.  I prefer the Airbus B612Mono font, but I respect your preference by just saying font-family: monospace.  If you read this on a plain text browser like me, this won't matter, of course.  I'm also looking for a high-contrast colorful stylesheet.  As you can see, I did use some flexboxes in here.  They don't seem to respect min-width and max-width properly, especially min-wdith.  Tell me if you have a solution, thanks.</p>
 			<p>This is free and unencumbered software released into the public domain.  Anyone is free to copy, modify, publish, use, compile, sell, or distribute this software, either in source code form or as a compiled binary, for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial, and by any means.  In jurisdictions that recognize copyright laws, the author or authors of this software dedicate any and all copyright interest in the software to the public domain. We make this dedication for the benefit of the public at large and to the detriment of our heirs and successors. We intend this dedication to be an overt act of relinquishment in perpetuity of all present and future rights to this software under copyright law.  THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.  For more information, please refer to <a href="https://unlicense.org/">https://unlicense.org</a></p>
 
-			<p>I know that this website is not a program and that HTML isn't considered a programming language.  Nevertheless, you can think of the HTML as code---even the plain text I write could also be considered code since languages are a code to give information.  Anyways, stuff on here that's supposed to be public (don't try to spoof my htaccess, don't hack my ssh, don't snoop on my email, etc) is public domain, including my projects and my git repos, unless otherwise specified by a file that looks like COPYING, LICENSE or licensing stuff in the source itself. <a href="https://stpeter.im/writings/essays/publicdomain.html">https://stpeter.im/writings/essays/publicdomain.html</a> is a good explanation on why people put stuff in the public domain.  However, you might want to see the "Help me choose licenses" section on this page.</p>
+			<p>I know that this website is not a program and that HTML isn't considered a programming language.  Nevertheless, you can think of the HTML as code---&emdash;even the plain text I write could also be considered code since languages are a code to give information.  Anyways, stuff on here that's supposed to be public (don't try to spoof my htaccess, don't hack my ssh, don't snoop on my email, etc) is public domain, including my projects and my git repos, unless otherwise specified by a file that looks like COPYING, LICENSE or licensing stuff in the source itself. <a href="https://stpeter.im/writings/essays/publicdomain.html">https://stpeter.im/writings/essays/publicdomain.html</a> is a good explanation on why people put stuff in the public domain.  However, you might want to see the "Help me choose licenses" section on this page.</p>
 		</div>
 	</body>
 </html>