summary refs log tree commit diff stats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew <andrew@andrewyu.org>2023-01-23 22:52:23 +0800
committerAutomatic Merge <andrew+automerge@andrewyu.org>2023-07-15 00:29:40 +0800
commit7b2dca420a6862ccc7521acdbee48eb23f8bd803 (patch)
tree887dc91401fb29b01052cb34ff415890ea2503ff
parente6bb8762d5a27b6e526f6756d967ae29ba683e7f (diff)
downloadwww-7b2dca420a6862ccc7521acdbee48eb23f8bd803.tar.gz
Redaction
-rwxr-xr-xarticle/math-science-and-philosophy.html10
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/article/math-science-and-philosophy.html b/article/math-science-and-philosophy.html
index 4ff5140..b9e2b93 100755
--- a/article/math-science-and-philosophy.html
+++ b/article/math-science-and-philosophy.html
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ nature that physics is supposed to be.</p>
 <p>I had a brief chat with Mr. Coxon and he aclled how the existence of
 neutrinos were predicted “mathematically” before they were
 experimentally discovered physically. I do not know the history of all
-this (MuonNeutrino could explain further), but Mr. Coxon said that physicists
+this, but Mr. Coxon said that physicists
 looked at a phenomenon (I believe that was beta decay) and went like:
 “where did that missing energy go”? and proposed that there was a
 particle called a neutrino that fills in the missing gap.
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ class="math inline"><i>A</i></span> (i. e. physics is squishy) is both
 true and false. Thus, <span class="math inline"><i>A</i> = 1</span>
 and <span class="math inline"><i>A</i> = 0</span> are both true. Then,
 take a random statement <span class="math inline"><i>B</i></span>
-(let’s say “MuonNeutrino likes humanities”). Thus we have <span
+(let’s say “Z likes humanities”). Thus we have <span
 class="math inline"><i>A</i> + <i>B</i> = 1</span> where <span
 class="math inline">+</span> is a boolean “or” operator because <span
 class="math inline"><i>A</i> = 1</span> and <span
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ class="math inline"><i>B</i></span> must be 1 (if <span
 class="math inline"><i>B</i></span> is zero, then <span
 class="math inline">0 + 0 = 0</span>). Thus, if we can prove that
 “physics is squishy” and “physics is not squishy” (without differences
-in definition), then we can literally prove that “MuonNeutrino likes
+in definition), then we can literally prove that “Z likes
 humanities”. Other from not defining subjective things like “squishy”
 and “is” (in terms of psychology), we can’t get around this easily, and
 everything would be provable, which would not be fun for
@@ -258,8 +258,8 @@ which sometimes simply summarizes ideas already expressed by others.
 Please see the attached reading materials for details. Works of Eugene
 Wigner were especially helpful.</p>
 <p>Contributors include many YK Pao School students and faculty.
-Insightful conversations with friends, including Muon Neutrino
-<strong>:)</strong>, have given me great inspiration in the ideas
+Insightful conversations with friends
+have given me great inspiration in the ideas
 expressed in this article and discussions are still ongoing. For privacy
 reasons other names aren’t listed, but I would be happy to put names on
 here at request/suggestion.</p>