summary refs log tree commit diff stats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRunxi Yu <harriet@andrewyu.org>2023-08-17 20:37:23 +0100
committerRunxi Yu <harriet@andrewyu.org>2023-08-17 20:38:10 +0100
commitc5be7bab3b6abbf4b071370540bc9c7aeba6ef0d (patch)
tree8d1c33ea5227270697357d23b722642ed56f61cf
parent0ad160dffd0efe2b80063727eb40990336ac3296 (diff)
downloadwww-c5be7bab3b6abbf4b071370540bc9c7aeba6ef0d.tar.gz
Microblog add hr
-rw-r--r--microblog/index.html15
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/microblog/index.html b/microblog/index.html
index d325878..876d51c 100644
--- a/microblog/index.html
+++ b/microblog/index.html
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 	<body>
 		<h1>Runxi Yu's Microblog</h1>
 		<p id="intro">
-		This is my <i>microblog</i>, a place for me to jot down random thoughts that I want to keep, but are too small enough to constitute a real article/post.
+		This is my <i>microblog</i>, a place for me to jot down random thoughts that I want to keep, but are too small enough to constitute a real article/post. Reverse chronological order.
 		</p>
 		<hr />
 		<p id="15">
@@ -18,14 +18,17 @@
 		I think a grea portion of this lies upon the dangers to democracy when censoring political speech. Is that a sufficient reason to accept freedom of speech as a universal right, that protects e.g. hate speech and inciting violence?
 		<a href="https://www.andrewyu.org/microblog/#15">&</a>
 		</p>
+		<hr />
 		<p id="14">
 		An illusion in a dream overpowers reality.
 		<a href="https://www.andrewyu.org/microblog/#14">&</a>
 		</p>
+		<hr />
 		<p id="13">
 		Hypocrisy is bad. I know, but I'm still complicit in it.
 		<a href="https://www.andrewyu.org/microblog/#13">&</a>
 		</p>
+		<hr />
 		<p id="12">
 		Continental liberalism and modern populist democracy eliminate the ruling class external to the people being ruled, leading to self-governance, preventing tyranny. However, the "people" who exercise the power are not always the same people who are affected by the power. The "will of the people", in practice, is the will of the most numerous or active subset of the people. Democracy is, on these grounds, often used as a utility for the tyranny of the majority.
 
@@ -37,6 +40,7 @@
 		</details>
 		<a href="https://www.andrewyu.org/microblog/#12">&</a>
 		</p>
+		<hr />
 		<p id="11">
 		I think my experience of gender dysphoria has became inconsistent in what I actually think about gender. My belief, in theory, is that gender should be eradicated (see "Postgenderism") altogether, as it’s an unnecessary construct that limits people, imposes cisnormativity, etc.
 		<br />
@@ -48,15 +52,18 @@
 		<br />
 		<a href="https://www.andrewyu.org/microblog/#11">&</a>
 		</p>
+		<hr />
 		<p id="10">
 		I myself live in a string of characters, through emotionless computers, running some old protocols.
 		The me of appearance is dead.
 		<a href="https://www.andrewyu.org/microblog/#10">&</a>
 		</p>
+		<hr />
 		<p id="8">
 		Democracy is the protection of negative freedom and civil liberties, not the enforcement of general will.
 		<a href="https://www.andrewyu.org/microblog/#8">&</a>
 		</p>
+		<hr />
 		<p id="7">
 		Reading <i>雷雨</i> and thinking about <i>A Streetcar Named Desire</i> and <i>The Glass Menagerie</i> There's a commonality in these plays&mdash;and perhaps many more&mdash;that struck me: The presentation of femininity as dependence.
 		<br />
@@ -68,28 +75,34 @@
 		<br />
 		<a href="https://www.andrewyu.org/microblog/#7">&</a>
 		</p>
+		<hr />
 		<p id="6">
 		I kinda think faith is something we all struggle with, and doesn't seem to be too relevant to whether we are religious in the traditional sense. For me there're things like faith in logic, faith in knowledge, faith in properties of humankind, etc. They seem to be so ungrounded, founded upon beliefs that I cannot support with my own weight.
 		<a href="https://www.andrewyu.org/microblog/#6">&</a>
 		</p>
+		<hr />
 		<p id="5">
 		As much as I believe in determinism, I do not believe that humans have capacity to pre-determine their own fate.
 		<a href="https://www.andrewyu.org/microblog/#5">&</a>
 		</p>
+		<hr />
 		<p id="4">
 		My world is still of metaphorical illusions. I need to learn to be afraid of romanticized narratives and perspectives. However, it is apparently hard to do so&mdash;I sink into romantic words that create a color filter in my perception, they make reality look so beautiful, so... "sweet", moving me further away from what reality really is.
 		<a href="https://www.andrewyu.org/microblog/#4">&</a>
 		</p>
+		<hr />
 		<p id="3">
 		I'm probably not the only one who has these dangerous/harmful/unhelpful thoughts:<br />
 		How different, or perhaps "better' could my life be, if I could go back to the start of Year 9, and make different decisions? Perhaps that would mean choosing something other than IGCSE History. Or perhaps that means... when that was still possible, let my yearn and longing for intimacy with trusted people to discuss philosophy and science with, stay undeveloped.<br />
 		Perhaps I could have became a happy person. The me of the present could never know.
 		<a href="https://www.andrewyu.org/microblog/#3">&</a>
 		</p>
+		<hr />
 		<p id="2">
 		To what extent is "it sets a precedent" a concern that justifies or warrants declining a request that is on its own, appropriate?
 		<a href="https://www.andrewyu.org/microblog/#2">&</a>
 		</p>
+		<hr />
 		<p id="1">
 		I hereby discard the structuralist view that people are composed of the opposing parts "benign" and "malicious". These simple and perhaps judgemental concepts are insufficient in face of the complexity of the human condition.
 		<a href="https://www.andrewyu.org/microblog/#1">&</a>