diff options
| author | Andrew Yu <andrew@andrewyu.org> | 2023-07-07 12:00:14 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Automatic Merge <andrew+automerge@andrewyu.org> | 2023-07-15 00:31:17 +0800 |
| commit | ec00a69ef1f7d21f784264b75d6fcca97fa7fb78 (patch) | |
| tree | c5a177f0a53c8ca6414a043ebf61c759c6153d05 /article/free-software-education-in-china-and-covid-19.html | |
| parent | cb53180786d36f35fd49d1e792cb365d10f4065b (diff) | |
| download | www-ec00a69ef1f7d21f784264b75d6fcca97fa7fb78.tar.gz | |
Use ``TeX-style quotes'' instead of “unicode quotes”
Diffstat (limited to 'article/free-software-education-in-china-and-covid-19.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | article/free-software-education-in-china-and-covid-19.html | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/article/free-software-education-in-china-and-covid-19.html b/article/free-software-education-in-china-and-covid-19.html index f225805..d397dfe 100644 --- a/article/free-software-education-in-china-and-covid-19.html +++ b/article/free-software-education-in-china-and-covid-19.html @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ </p> <p> - The contact tracing system used is not Free Software. At first I didn't understand why (except for the explanation that they want to profit from harming citizens which is hopefully just a hypothetical “explanation”), but I noticed that the authenticity and accuracy of the system may be affected if users are allowed to modify their software. This seems to be the core of some problems with regards to software freedom—here, the user is not running software to complete their tasks. Rather, it's the government's way to maintain public safety, therefore I believe that whether users should be able to modify software in these conditions is up to discussion. Back to the point, since a green-code proof from the system is needed to get in a lot of places, a person basically needs to use proprietary software to live a normal life (to get into coffee shops, for example). + The contact tracing system used is not Free Software. At first I didn't understand why (except for the explanation that they want to profit from harming citizens which is hopefully just a hypothetical ``explanation''), but I noticed that the authenticity and accuracy of the system may be affected if users are allowed to modify their software. This seems to be the core of some problems with regards to software freedom—here, the user is not running software to complete their tasks. Rather, it's the government's way to maintain public safety, therefore I believe that whether users should be able to modify software in these conditions is up to discussion. Back to the point, since a green-code proof from the system is needed to get in a lot of places, a person basically needs to use proprietary software to live a normal life (to get into coffee shops, for example). </p> <p> |