must, should, etc language quirks

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/pragmatics.html b/pragmatics.html
index 95c3c7e..e8efdff 100644
--- a/pragmatics.html
+++ b/pragmatics.html
@@ -1299,7 +1299,7 @@ li > p:last-of-type {
       <h2 id="name-action-procedure-2">
 <a href="#section-3" class="section-number selfRef">3. </a><a href="#name-action-procedure-2" class="section-name selfRef">Action Procedure</a>
       </h2>
-<p id="section-3-1">Activists <strong>SOULD NOT</strong> list such nonfree services in "Contact Information" pages on their website or similar sources, unless followed by a explanation that the purpose of the nonfree platform is to introduce users thereof onto free protocols and to eventually exterminate the nonfree platform.  Whenever these references to nonfree platforms appear, the author <span class="bcp14">MUST</span> present free methods of communication.  Activists <span class="bcp14">SHOULD</span> pragmatically use as many of the popular free protocols as possible, to ensure that oppurtunities of introductions are not lost.  In cases involving competition between free and nonfree protocols and platforms, ethical concerns (i.e. enabling talking to a new user on any ethical platform) <span class="bcp14">MUST</span> take precedence over technical concerns (such as disliking the XMPP protocol for its inefficent use of XML) whenever possible.<a href="#section-3-1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
+<p id="section-3-1">Activists <span class="bcp14">MUST NOT</span> list such nonfree services in "Contact Information" pages on their website or similar sources, unless followed by a explanation that the purpose of the nonfree platform is to introduce users thereof onto free protocols and to eventually exterminate the nonfree platform.  Whenever these references to nonfree platforms appear, the author <span class="bcp14">MUST</span> present free methods of communication.  Activists <span class="bcp14">SHOULD</span> pragmatically use as many of the popular free protocols as possible, to ensure that oppurtunities of introductions are not lost.  In cases involving competition between free and nonfree protocols and platforms, ethical concerns (i.e. enabling talking to a new user on any ethical platform) <span class="bcp14">MUST</span> take precedence over technical concerns (such as disliking the XMPP protocol for its inefficent use of XML) whenever possible.<a href="#section-3-1" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 <p id="section-3-2">Communities for introducing users to Free Software on nonfree platforms <span class="bcp14">MUST</span> be bridged to a free protocol in some obvious way, in order to minimize the usage of nonfree platforms even for the purpose of communicating ideology to new users and allow members of the Free Software community refusing to use nonfree platforms in any way to participate.  Usages of nonfree platforms, besides part of the user-introduction process that must happen on the nonfree platform, <span class="bcp14">SHOULD</span> be avoided.<a href="#section-3-2" class="pilcrow">¶</a></p>
 </section>
 </div>