diff options
author | Andrew Yu <andrew@andrewyu.org> | 2022-04-16 21:12:05 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Yu <andrew@andrewyu.org> | 2022-04-16 21:12:05 +0200 |
commit | 157821215cc1e776ee90fe567d23938230803180 (patch) | |
tree | efde1540a8528b2f8149a4cde58e9fc2b1e2914d /pragmatics.txt | |
parent | 91fd35d2300129c96c12ff6a69e3dadda09ba1a1 (diff) | |
download | www-157821215cc1e776ee90fe567d23938230803180.tar.gz |
practical guidelines, i guess
Diffstat (limited to 'pragmatics.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | pragmatics.txt | 124 |
1 files changed, 90 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/pragmatics.txt b/pragmatics.txt index 990d510..84983ce 100644 --- a/pragmatics.txt +++ b/pragmatics.txt @@ -26,14 +26,15 @@ Status of This Memo Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 2. The Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3. Technical Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 4. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 5. FSF Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 6. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + 2. Justification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 + 3. Action Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + 4. Technical Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + 5. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + 6. FSF Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + 7. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 + Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 + Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1. Introduction @@ -44,12 +45,11 @@ Table of Contents technology coorporations, our methods of communicating with the masses are ineffective. - In February 2022, the author decided to adjust his dogma, and - permitted limited usage of nonfree chat platforms to hopefully spread - our ideas to the general public. This was attempted by registering a - Discord account, creating a Guild called "Free Software - Introductions", and setting up a basic Discord-to-IRC relay to #fsi - on both irc.andrewyu.org and irc.libera.chat. + + + + + @@ -58,6 +58,13 @@ Yu Informational [Page 1] Pragmatic Use of Nonfree Software April 2022 + In February 2022, the author decided to adjust his dogma, and + permitted limited usage of nonfree chat platforms to hopefully spread + our ideas to the general public. This was attempted by registering a + Discord account, creating a Guild called "Free Software + Introductions", and setting up a basic Discord-to-IRC relay to #fsi + on both irc.andrewyu.org and irc.libera.chat. + One of the communities that he knows about, the VF-Technic Minetest community, primarily uses Discord as a means of communication by plays not in-game. As the users inside are Minetest players, a Free @@ -69,6 +76,8 @@ Yu Informational [Page 1] Technic Guild, some people joined, and we've partially converted two users. +2. Justification + Two users is definitely few, but it sets a start and an example for how freedom can be spread. @@ -97,6 +106,14 @@ Yu Informational [Page 1] typically know but don't completely understand Free Software. Rather than using Matrix IDs to identify users, the Matrix specification specifies that third-party platform identities, such as email and + + + +Yu Informational [Page 2] + + Pragmatic Use of Nonfree Software April 2022 + + GitHub, are how users should be referenced both internally by servers and shown to other users. This is obviously an increadibly foolish idea, especially considering the use of centralized identity servers @@ -106,14 +123,6 @@ Yu Informational [Page 1] It is true that Libera Chat and similar IRC networks, though multi- centered in a technical way (i.e. multiple IRC servers form an IRC network), the network is politically centralized, controlled by one - - - -Yu Informational [Page 2] - - Pragmatic Use of Nonfree Software April 2022 - - entity, Libera. The Internet Relay Chat server-to-server protocol implies that servers fully trust each other and are expected to not send damaging commands, which in turn implies full trust between @@ -150,31 +159,55 @@ Yu Informational [Page 2] community to progress by understanding common features that users of nonfree services use. - The latter is more interesting, with reasons explained above. + The latter is more interesting, as explained above our methods of + spreading awareness is limited. -2. The Plan -3. Technical Limitations - git://git.andrewyu.org/internet-delay-chat - -4. Conclusion - Hi +Yu Informational [Page 3] + + Pragmatic Use of Nonfree Software April 2022 +3. Action Procedure + + Activists *SOULD NOT* list such nonfree services in "Contact + Information" pages on their website or similar sources, unless + followed by a explanation that the purpose of the nonfree platform is + to introduce users thereof onto free protocols and to eventually + exterminate the nonfree platform. Whenever these references to + nonfree platforms appear, the author MUST present free methods of + communication. Activists SHOULD pragmatically use as many of the + popular free protocols as possible, to ensure that oppurtunities of + introductions are not lost. In cases involving competition between + free and nonfree protocols and platforms, ethical concerns (i.e. + enabling talking to a new user on any ethical platform) MUST take + precedence over technical concerns (such as disliking the XMPP + protocol for its inefficent use of XML) whenever possible. + + Communities for introducing users to Free Software on nonfree + platforms MUST be bridged to a free protocol in some obvious way, in + order to minimize the usage of nonfree platforms even for the purpose + of communicating ideology to new users and allow members of the Free + Software community refusing to use nonfree platforms in any way to + participate. Usages of nonfree platforms, besides part of the user- + introduction process that must happen on the nonfree platform, SHOULD + be avoided. + +4. Technical Limitations + git://git.andrewyu.org/internet-delay-chat -Yu Informational [Page 3] - - Pragmatic Use of Nonfree Software April 2022 +5. Conclusion + Hi -5. FSF Considerations +6. FSF Considerations Hi -6. Normative References +7. Normative References [RMSGP] The GNU Project, "Is It Ever a Good Thing to Use a Nonfree Program?", September 2013, <http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/ @@ -182,6 +215,17 @@ Yu Informational [Page 3] Acknowledgements + + + + + + +Yu Informational [Page 4] + + Pragmatic Use of Nonfree Software April 2022 + + Contributors Many thanks to everyone in the Free Software community for the @@ -221,4 +265,16 @@ Author's Address -Yu Informational [Page 4] + + + + + + + + + + + + +Yu Informational [Page 5] |