summary refs log tree commit diff stats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--article/affirmative-action.txt80
-rw-r--r--article/harvard-aa.html20
-rw-r--r--article/index.html2
3 files changed, 81 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/article/affirmative-action.txt b/article/affirmative-action.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..04c67c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/article/affirmative-action.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+Subject: Affirmative Action

+From: Andrew Yu <andrew@andrewyu.org>

+Message-Id: <CTWUQHND92OE.31YJ2FM2GHPTB@andrewyu>

+Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2023 14:14:28 +0000

+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

+X-Mailer: aerc 0.14.0

+X-Article-ID: 21

+

+(Slightly modified for "publication")

+

+Here is my attempt at the Harvard/UNC affirmative action question,

+though I can't guarantee it's comprehensive, objective or developed, and

+the language here is deadly plain. Be aware that there's a fair bit of

+ethics, political philosophy and (minimal but still) US politics ahead.

+Also, since I'm Asian myself (of course, disadvantaged under the AA

+policies), perhaps I'm biased.

+

+Firstly, let me declare my unconventional "stance". I believe that

+affirmative action based on race is generally useless and may backfire;

+however if I were a supreme court justice, I would vote with the

+Liberals, to not interfere with the affirmative action policies of the

+universities.

+

+I'll start with why I believe that the court shouldn't interfere with

+the universities' policies. Harvard and UNC are private universities.

+They have their own ideals, and as long as they're not causing active

+harm to society (in my opinion, that'd be violating other people's

+negative liberty in the traditional interpretation by Isaiah Berlin—I am

+aware that there are paradoxes but it's the closest to a consistent

+theory of political philosophy that I can reach for now). Simply

+speaking, the students they admit is irrelevant to the government/state.

+If we consider public universities on the other hand, then sure. The

+government funds them, is supposed to set their goals and policies, and

+is responsible for their admissions and could rightfully implement

+policies that they see fit, but for private educational institutions, my

+"small government" mindset comes in.

+

+However, there are interesting arguments surrounding how "elite"

+universities such as Harvard, and to some extent UNC, have substantial

+social impact on society, as they are more or less a standard in

+defining tertiary education in the US and globally. Other educational

+institutions may follow their policies in attempts to bring themselves

+to the prestigious "standard" that elite institutions set, these elite

+universities are crucial in educational mobility, there might be

+potential public investment, etc. However I still intuitively think that

+the government shouldn't intervene, perhaps because of how in the US,

+court cases set precedents, and a precedent of such intervention would

+"allow" for government expansion and potential for the government to dip

+their feet into more private business. 

+

+Now I'll briefly argue why I believe that affirmative action based on

+race is generally useless and may backfire. There are three main reasons

+that I could think of for affirmative action, I'll describe my opinion

+on each, one by one.

+

+First, that affirmative action promotes diversity. I (personally) think

+that diversity is an insufficient reason to be potentially racially

+discriminating (people with the same academic capability may be

+rejected/admitted based on racial quotas, which may be considered a form

+of discrimination based on factors that they couldn't control).

+

+Second, that affirmative action adjusts for educational inequality. I

+haven't fact-checked this, but perhaps it's true that African-Americans,

+on average, live in poorer communities and have lesser access to good

+secondary education. Therefore their grades cannot fully reflect their

+academic potential, and universities admissions should compensate for

+that. Now aside from how this feels patronizing, race is no longer a

+good measure of "lack of educational resources due to financial

+situations/etc", with the existence of quite affluent African-American

+families. Affirmative action (if any) for

+educational-inequality-adjustment could be better implemented by looking

+at education and financial situations themselves, not race.

+

+Third, that affirmative action compensates for past wrongs. Having what

+people's ancestors do affect them negatively present-day feels awkward,

+although arguably people benefitting from the achievements of their

+ancestors means that they also need to take relevant responsibilities.

+

+Anyways, here are my thoughts… a bit incomplete but might be

+interesting. Cheers!

diff --git a/article/harvard-aa.html b/article/harvard-aa.html
deleted file mode 100644
index 6ccba22..0000000
--- a/article/harvard-aa.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
-<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en">
-	<head>
-		<title>Affirmative Action in Light of <++></title>
-		<link rel="stylesheet" href="/style.css" />
-		<link rel="shortcut icon" href="/favicon.ico" type="image/x-icon" />
-		<meta charset="utf-8" />
-	</head>
-	<body>
-		<h1>Affirmative Action in Light of <++></h1>
-		<p>Article ID: 21</p>
-		<p>
-		Recently, the Supreme Court ruled 6-to-3 that Harvard and UNC's affirmative action policy
-		</p>
-		<div id="footer">
-			<hr />
-			<p><a href="/">Andrew Yu's Website</a></p>
-		</div>
-	</body>
-</html>
diff --git a/article/index.html b/article/index.html
index afe2e30..fb5c9cf 100644
--- a/article/index.html
+++ b/article/index.html
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 		<p>Pages for other projects (i.e. Evosaur) are not listed&mdash;only independent articles are listed here.  These are sorted from newest to oldest.  Some do not come with HTML anchors: these articles are not published online, but are still listed here.  For these, you may ask me for a copy in real life, but it is within my rights to decline such requests.  Note that if an article ID has an asterisk (*), it is considered fiction and its meaning shall not be interpreted literally.</p>
 		<p><a href="/contact.html">Feel free to comment on any of the articles.</a></p>
 		<ul>
-			<li><a href="harvard-aa.html">Affirmative Action in Light of <++></a> (21)</li>
+			<li><a href="affirmative-action.txt">Affirmative Action in Light of Harvard/UNC Case</a> (21)</li>
 			<li><a href="hardware-oligopoly.html">Hardware Oligopolies and the Decentralization of Hardware Production</a> (20)</li>
 			<li><a href="unicorn.html">Unicorn</a> (19*)</li>
 			<li><a href="texmacs-maxima-integral.html">TeXmacs Maxima Integrals</a> (18)</li>