summary refs log tree commit diff stats
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Modify line breaks in the last poemRunxi Yu2023-09-241-2/+5
|
* Slight touches to the destroy-not-lose poemRunxi Yu2023-09-231-2/+2
|
* rain soakRunxi Yu2023-09-221-0/+5
|
* Another little poemRunxi Yu2023-09-211-0/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 我就会在那里 等待着 有人能救救我 我会将我以为对我最重要的人 拽入那个漩涡 他们一一挣脱； 远去 我仍然倔强地伸出我的一只手 试图引人注意 乞讨 展现自己所谓的无助 渴望找到一个人 与我一起 沦 陷
* Dry glands weak capillariesRunxi Yu2023-09-211-0/+9
|
* Drip of Soul to the PufferfishRunxi Yu2023-09-171-0/+31
|
* In Thaler v. Perlmutter (2023), the Federal District Court for D.C. ruled ↵Runxi Yu2023-09-141-17/+22
| | | | | | that “Underlying that adaptability, however, has been a consistent understanding that human creativity is the sine qua non at the core of copyrightability”. 17 U.S.C. § 102(a) says that “Copyright protection subsists [..] in original works […] either directly or with the aid of a machine or device”. My question is outside of the scope of this lawsuit: do prompts to AI count as a human using the “aid of a machine or device” to create a creative work? Or, is the transformation from a simple textual prompt to a graphical representation considered transformative under Campbell and 17 U.S.C. § 107, such that the AI is the creator of the secondary graphical work, to the extent that it is not a derivative work of the text prompt? Or would the prompt simply be considered an idea, which is not copyrightable under Baker v. Selden?
* Should federal governments prevent overreach of *state* governments?Runxi Yu2023-09-121-1/+6
|
* Intimate interactionsRunxi Yu2023-09-101-0/+13
|
* ShockRunxi Yu2023-09-101-0/+26
|
* Add missing <hr />Runxi Yu2023-09-091-0/+1
|
* ComediesRunxi Yu2023-09-081-0/+5
|
* HypocrisyRunxi Yu2023-09-041-1/+4
|
* PrecedentsRunxi Yu2023-08-311-0/+5
|
* Melancholy + TZRunxi Yu2023-08-311-1/+2
|
* Pronouns updateRunxi Yu2023-08-311-1/+0
|
* Microblog: fear and relationship with the fearedRunxi Yu2023-08-301-0/+5
|
* Maybe it’s being alive that makes them lie, and being almost not alive ↵Runxi Yu2023-08-291-0/+6
| | | | makes me sort of accidentally truthful… —Brick, Act 3, Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, by Tennessee Williams
* BurnoutRunxi Yu2023-08-281-0/+5
|
* science?Runxi Yu2023-08-251-0/+5
|
* moral conscienceRunxi Yu2023-08-251-0/+5
|
* Fold preamble of journey overcoming rationalismRunxi Yu2023-08-251-0/+5
|
* Perhaps a journey to overcome rationalismRunxi Yu2023-08-252-0/+64
|
* guilt towards myselfRunxi Yu2023-08-241-0/+2
|
* trans experienceRunxi Yu2023-08-241-0/+2
|
* blehRunxi Yu2023-08-241-0/+7
|
* Internal/externalRunxi Yu2023-08-241-0/+5
|
* spellcheckRunxi Yu2023-08-241-1/+1
|
* """Traditional family values"""Runxi Yu2023-08-241-0/+11
|
* "Pretty horrible"Runxi Yu2023-08-241-1/+1
|
* Moral intuitionismRunxi Yu2023-08-241-0/+7
|
* MicroblogRunxi Yu2023-08-231-0/+6
|
* Hm, do you think advancements in the understanding of physics couldRunxi Yu2023-08-231-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | improve understanding on causality, determinism and free will? (“Interpretations” of physics is not my expertise and I’m a bit skeptical, but I’ll try to be careful not to get into mysticism…) (Warning: disgusting) The common argument that collapsing superpositions leads to inherent randomness and thus makes free will possible seems to be misaligned with what people mean when discussing free will. I’ll explain my skepticism with an analogy: A scientist will do something differently if they detect that a radioactive sample decays in five seconds. The scientist’s state and actions depend on random decay of the sample, and I won’t call this free will of the scientist. I don’t think there’s something fundamentally different about the supposed (and really interpretive and perhaps mystic) collapse of superpositions in the brain causing things to go differently, and my example on radioactive decay. No matter if they’re inside or outside the body, truly random events are still spontaneously random
* Antinatalism WP linkRunxi Yu2023-08-221-0/+2
|
* child consent stuffRunxi Yu2023-08-221-0/+5
|
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalismRunxi Yu2023-08-211-1/+2
|
* fix <sup>th</sup> to thRunxi Yu2023-08-211-1/+1
|
* Add 于润熙 as my Chinese nameRunxi Yu2023-08-211-1/+1
|
* they/themRunxi Yu2023-08-211-1/+1
|
* Consciousness of AIs being irrelevantRunxi Yu2023-08-211-0/+5
|
* badly written affirmative-action.txt noteRunxi Yu2023-08-211-0/+3
|
* null hypothesisRunxi Yu2023-08-211-0/+7
|
* Fix microblogRunxi Yu2023-08-202-1/+17
|
* 17Runxi Yu2023-08-201-0/+7
|
* AdelineRunxi Yu2023-08-172-2/+2
|
* Microblog add hrRunxi Yu2023-08-171-1/+14
|
* Remove HTML smart quotesRunxi Yu2023-08-1743-214/+214
|
* JSM quoteRunxi Yu2023-08-171-1/+8
|
* 0.7emRunxi Yu2023-08-171-1/+1
|
* Freedom of speechRunxi Yu2023-08-171-0/+5
|
generated by cgit-pink 1.4.1-2-gfad0 (git 2.36.2.497.gbbea4dcf42) at 2024-11-25 04:51:17 +0000